Subject: Proposal for OSI membership structure
From: Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken.Coar@Golux.Com>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:58:07 -0400

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I sent this yesterday, but don't see that it came through.
So let's try again..

To get the ball rolling, here's what I've worked
out so far.  It's slightly more than just membership,
although that's most of it.  This is a proposal for
an overall broadening of OSI involvement and accessibility.

1. Membership.
- --------------
I propose three types of membership:

a. 'Interested party' affiliation:
   o No dues.
   o No approval necessary.
   o Permission to use a (to be designed) 'I support Open Source'
     graphic.
   o No ability to vote.
   o No special mailing list access.

b. Contributing membership:
   o Annual dues TBD (~US$20 maybe, adjusted regionally).
   o Requires approval by membership.
   o Permission to use a (to be designed) 'OSI Member'
     graphic.
   o Binding franchise for contributing membership, officer, and
     corporate membership votes.
   o Subscription to a private OSI-only list.
   o Access to all OSI mailing lists save those which are
     specifically confidential.

c. Corporate membership.
   o Annual dues TBD (~US$5'000 maybe).
   o Requires approval by board.  (Ratification by membership?)
   o Permission to use a (to be designed) 'OSI Corporate Sponsor'
     graphic.
   o Non-binding advisory vote on admission of other corporate
     members.
   o No special mailing list access.

Annual meetings of contributing membership, called the Assembly,
to vote on new members, board elections, other things requiring
membership ratification.  Combined physical and online participation
(such as IRC) may be problematic; streaming of physical activity
combined with some means for remote feedback maybe.  More
frequent meetings possible (such as at conferences), but not
counted as 'annual' meetings where board is elected, etc.

Rationale:
. Anyone should be able to 'raise a hand' and signify that they
  support OSI.
. To have a say in what OSI does requires some sort of commitment.
  The 'approval' process is an attempted governor on being subverted
  by mass enlistments from any specific source.  (Apache has this.)
  Scalability is problematic; a 'web of trust' mechanism may well
  be needed to supplement personal acquaintance.
. Corporate membership is essentially buying a logo and the ability
  to advise OSI about business-scope behaviour of other corporate
  applicants, info that may not be otherwise available to OSI.

2. Regional representation.
- ---------------------------
a. 'College of Representatives':
   Composed of one or more representatives from geographic,
   ethnic, or political regions.  Fellows act as bi-directional
   conduits, providing dissemination of OSI information into
   their regions (potentially including translation) and act as
   points of contact with OSI for interests in their regions.
   Responsible for coordination of regional 'OSI user groups.'
   Fellowship includes contributing membership gratis whilst
   serving.  Permission to use 'OSI regional fellow' graphic.
   Subscription to OSI-private 'college strategy' mailing list.
   Fellows appointed by board, ratified annually by members,
   may be proposed by members, and serve at the pleasure of
   the board.

====
Obviously the terms ('fellows,' 'college,' 'assembly') are just
working ones; please don't get hung up on the words rather
than what they're representing.  :-)
- --
#ken	P-)}

Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini  http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist      http://Apache-Server.Com/

"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBRGH/f5rNPMCpn3XdAQKtNAQA2Nel5HVp0c6abOCBrjS3EwcxhM4WYNX5
4q17Ze0mdSCXet0ncOoCf+Y4mF48wPs9dHc8zVVtGz1I214UHVFd6dCZa6U5rlxU
1Qd2rK6BTSD59IniV2oYxP8xoftOFoIN1x6lghsu6hdK3R2RLPoyKr2DrlR7puJI
hL07wIR1/s4=
=twHm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----