Since Google hasn't submitted the WebM license, and it's in the
community's interest to review it, I am making a third-party submission.
I plan to issue a derivative work of the WebM project under the WebM
license, and thus have a legitimate interest in the license.
The license as it exists today is at
This submission is not an endorsement of the license text exactly as
written. I think there's a mistake in the text, possibly not deliberate.
I believe the formal review process, rather than any back-channel
discussion that might be happening, is the best forum for repair of the