Subject: RE: WebM license third-party submission
From: "Lawrence Rosen" <lrosen@rosenlaw.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 10:12:12 -0700

Josh Berkus wrote:
> This looks like a 3-clause BSD license with a patent grant.  Surely
> something like that exists already?

Sure, only more complete and thought-out: 

See AFL 3.0 (http://opensource.org/licenses/afl-3.0.php). 

/Larry 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh@postgresql.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 9:53 AM
> To: license-review@opensource.org
> Subject: Re: WebM license third-party submission
> 
> On 05/25/2010 12:23 AM, Bruce Perens wrote:
> > Since Google hasn't submitted the WebM license, and it's in the
> > community's interest to review it, I am making a third-party
> submission.
> > I plan to issue a derivative work of the WebM project under the WebM
> > license, and thus have a legitimate interest in the license.
> >
> > The license as it exists today is at
> > http://www.webmproject.org/license/software/
> 
> This looks like a 3-clause BSD license with a patent grant.  Surely
> something like that exists already?
> 
> --Josh Berkus