By: Rick Moen
- Report on ssh 1.2.12 licencing
- GNU License for Hardware
- GNU License for Hardware
- Accusations, accusations, always accusations
- Accusations, accusations, always accusations
- Re: Accusations, accusations, always accusations
- Eiffel Forum License
- prohibiting use that would result in death or personal injury
- prohibiting use that would result in death or personal injury
- prohibiting use that would result in death or personal injury
- prohibiting use that would result in death or personal injury
- prohibiting use that would result in death or personal injury
- prohibiting use that would result in death or personal injury
- prohibiting use that would result in death or personal injury
- License Approval Process
- License Approval Process
- License Approval Process
- Plan 9 license
- Plan 9 license
- Plan 9 license
- OpenSales -- DRAFT developers agreement
- Plan 9 license
- OpenSales -- DRAFT developers agreement
- Plan 9 license
- Qt and the GPL
- Qt and the GPL
- Disallowing distribution of binaries
- simpleLinux Open Documentation License (sLODL)
- simpleLinux Open Documentation License (sLODL)
- Linux 0.97 is under GPL, isn't it?
- LGPL clarification
- Free documentation licenses
- Free documentation licenses
- Free documentation licenses
- Free documentation licenses
- Free documentation licenses
- Tarball licenses (was: Free documentation licenses)
- Tarball licenses (was: Free documentation licenses)
- Tarball licenses (was: Free documentation licenses)
- Re: IPL as a burden
- Misunderstanding of the basics?
- Re: IPL as a burden
- The Toll Roads of Open Source
- The Toll Roads of Open Source
- The Toll Roads of Open Source
- Document formats (was: To the keepers of the holy grail of Open Source)
- Document formats (was: To the keepers of the holy grail of Open Source)
- Document formats (was: To the keepers of the holy grail of Open Source)
- Use of GPL without any intention to enforce
- boomberg bloopers
- What is Copyleft?
- Re: Subscription/Service Fees - OSI Intent
- idle-priority: OWL R1
- license submission: qmail
- SUN Binary Code License
- SUN Binary Code License
- license-mix, legal consequences?
- Real-World Copyright Assignment
- license-mix, legal consequences?
- Real-World Copyright Assignment
- Real-World Copyright Assignment
- approved licenses web page not being updated
- approved licenses web page not being updated
- Quick Reference For Choosing a Free Software License
- Quick Reference For Choosing a Free Software License
- Public Domain License
- W3C license
- documentation
- W3C license
- W3C license
- W3C license
- W3C license
- RealNetworks' RTSP Proxy License
- Backlog assistance?
- Backlog assistance?
- Backlog assistance?
- YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?)
- YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?)
- YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?)
- YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?)
- YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?)
- YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?)
- GPL vs APSL (was: YAPL is bad)
- GPL vs APSL (was: YAPL is bad)
- YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?)
- OSD #2 (was Re: GPL vs APSL (was: YAPL is bad))
- OSD #2 (was Re: GPL vs APSL (was: YAPL is bad))
- click, click, boom
- YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?)
- YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?)
- click, click, boom
- click, click, boom
- YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?)
- YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?)
- forums
- forums
- forums
- The Invisible Hand
- Software patents and copyrights
- Two GPL Questions
- Two GPL Questions
- Two GPL Questions
- Two GPL Questions
- Two GPL Questions
- Re: Advertising Clauses in Licenses
- open source licenses and algorithms
- open source licenses and algorithms
- Re: Advertising Clauses in Licenses
- OFF-TOPIC: Qt history refresher course?
- OFF-TOPIC: Qt history refresher course?
- Limiting the use of an OpenSource application
- request for approval of APOSSL
- request for approval of APOSSL
- request for approval of APOSSL
- Discuss: BSD Protection License
- Discuss: BSD Protection License
- Discuss: BSD Protection License
- Discuss: BSD Protection License
- Discuss: BSD Protection License
- Discuss: Request for OSI approval
- Discuss: Request for OSI approval
- Discuss: Request for OSI approval
- Discuss: Request for OSI approval
- Discuss: Request for OSI approval
- Discuss: Request for OSI approval
- Are you RALLY serious?
- GPL license and timeout
- Changing the licensing terms for an application
- Legal soundness comes to open source distribution
- Legal soundness comes to open source distribution
- Legal soundness comes to open source distribution
- Partial OpenSource products/licenses?
- Copyright
- [OT] TINLA
- [OT] TINLA
- [kmself@ix.netcom.com: Re: We are looking for an open source license that...]
- Antiwar License
- Antiwar License
- Antiwar License
- Ethics (OT) (was Re: Antiwar License)
- Ethics (OT) (was Re: Antiwar License)
- legal issues under GPL
- Reverse Engineering and Derived Works in Open Source Licenses?
- Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL
- Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL
- Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL
- Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list
- Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL
- Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL
- Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list
- Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL
- Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL
- Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL
- Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list
- Optimal license for Java projects ...
- Optimal license for Java projects ...
- Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list
- Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL
- Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list
- Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL
- Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list
- Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list
- Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list
- Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list
- Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list
- Open Source Business Found Parasitic, and the ADCL
- Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list
- Please add "Public Domain" to "license" list
- Re: study of GNU GPL vs MS EULA
- Re: study of GNU GPL vs MS EULA
- Re: study of GNU GPL vs MS EULA
- Microsoft's near-OSD-compliant shared source license
- Open source and trademarks
- Open source and trademarks
- is it just summertime?
- Can abandonment be irrevocable?
- Can abandonment be irrevocable?
- For Approval: Open Source Software Alliance License
- For Approval: Open Source Software Alliance License
- For Approval: Open Source Software Alliance License
- For Approval: Open Source Software Alliance License
- For Approval: Open Source Software Alliance License
- For Approval: Open Source Software Alliance License
- For Approval: Open Source Software Alliance License
- Facts please
- Facts please
- Facts please
- OSD#5 needs a patch?
- OSD#5 needs a patch?
- OSD#5 needs a patch?
- OSD#5 needs a patch?
- OSD#5 needs a patch?
- OSD#5 needs a patch?
- OSD#5 needs a patch?
- OSD#5 needs a patch?
- OSD#5 needs a patch?
- OSD#5 needs a patch?
- OSD#5 needs a patch?
- OSD#5 needs a patch?
- OSD#5 needs a patch?
- Silly question: are usage restrictions covered by the OSD?
- Silly question: are usage restrictions covered by the OSD?
- Silly question: are usage restrictions covered by the OSD?
- mysql
- Re: Vacation messages to list posts
- Why?
- Why?
- Why?
- Re: Why? & Re: Will we be sued?
- IBM and Patents
- IBM and Patents
- Help with license decision for "cluster" of similar projects
- A must read for license law
- Proprietary software at opensource.org
- Open Content licenses
- "open-source" x "free software"
- Which license to use for MFC based software?
- Which license to use for MFC based software?
- Which license to use for MFC based software?
- Which license to use for MFC based software?
- Re: Dual Licensing
- Re: Dual Licensing
- Re: Dual Licensing
- Re: Dual Licensing
- Re: Dual Licensing
- Re: Dual Licensing
- Re: Dual Licensing
- Re: Dual Licensing
- Re: Dual Licensing
- Re: Dual Licensing
- Re: Dual Licensing
- GPL and internal use
- Re: Dual licensing -- other wrinkles
- the provide, license verbs (was: Dual licensing)
- Re: the provide, license verbs
- the provide, license verbs (was: Dual licensing)
- Re: the provide, license verbs
- Re: the provide, license verbs
- Re: the provide, license verbs
- Re: the provide, license verbs
- Re: the provide, license verbs
- Re: the provide, license verbs
- Re: the provide, license verbs
- Re: the provide, license verbs
- Re: Dual Licensing
- Re: Dual Licensing
- Re: Dual Licensing
- Re: Dual Licensing
- Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception?
- Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception?
- Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception?
- Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception?
- Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception?
- Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception?
- Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception?
- Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception?
- Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception?
- Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception?
- Dual license question
- Dual license question
- testing kit conformance as a condition of distribution
- On the licensing terms of the open source licenses text
- Help Selecting License
- Help Selecting License
- AFL - non-sublicenseable versus distributable
- The IBM Public License
- Redistribution constraint
- IBM's direction
- For Approval: Allegro giftware license
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- For Approval: Allegro giftware license
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- [rick@linuxmafia.com: Re: compatibility and the OSD]
- compatibility and the OSD
- For Approval: Allegro giftware license
- For Approval: Allegro giftware license
- compatibility and the OSD
- For Approval: Academic Citing License
- For Approval: Academic Citing License
- Slashdotted blog - was RE: compatibility and the OSD
- For Approval: Academic Citing License
- For Approval: Academic Citing License
- compatibility and the OSD
- For Approval: Academic Citing License
- For Approval: Academic Citing License
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- For Approval: Academic Citing License
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- For Approval: Academic Citing License
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- compatibility and the OSD
- Creative Commons and public domain declarations
- Creative Commons and public domain declarations
- Definition of open source
- Definition of open source
- Definition of open source
- Definition of open source
- Definition of open source
- Definition of open source
- Definition of open source
- Definition of open source
- Definition of open source
- Definition of open source
- Definition of open source
- Definition of open source
- Definition of open source
- Definition of open source
- Definition of open source
- brainstorming
- [OT] Russ Nelson's public relations
- [OT] Russ Nelson's public relations
- Permissions not granted by GPL
- Three new proposed OSD terms
- An explanation of the difficulty of solving license proliferation in one sentence
- An explanation of the difficulty of solving license proliferation in one sentence
- An explanation of the difficulty of solving license proliferation in one sentence
- An explanation of the difficulty of solving license proliferation in one sentence
- An explanation of the difficulty of solving license proliferation in one sentence
- An explanation of the difficulty of solving license proliferation in one sentence
- "viral" (was RE: Licensing options for firmware)
- "viral" (was RE: Licensing options for firmware)
- "viral" (was RE: Licensing options for firmware)
- "viral" (was RE: Licensing options for firmware)
- "viral" (was RE: Licensing options for firmware)
- "viral" (was RE: Licensing options for firmware)
- "viral" (was RE: Licensing options for firmware)
- License Wizard; previously Re: An explanation of the difficulty of solving licenseproliferation in one sentence
- "Open Source Constitution"?
- OSI's war on corporate licenses
- OSI's war on corporate licenses
- "viral" (was RE: Licensing options for firmware)
- Mistaken statement about MPL?
- OSI's war on corporate licenses
- asymmetry?
- Wondering if my license already exists
- Administravia - list unsubscription
- Administravia - list unsubscription
- Administravia - list unsubscription
- Pre-existing purpose and value vs Adminstrative rules
- License Committee Report for September 2005
- Pre-existing purpose and value vs Adminstrative rules
- selling GPL sources
- selling GPL sources
- selling GPL sources
- selling GPL sources
- selling GPL sources
- selling GPL sources
- selling GPL sources
- selling GPL sources
- selling GPL sources
- Restrictions in license
- Governance and responsibility
- Clamav License
- Restrictions in license
- advertising clause / PKCS#11 header files
- For Approval: MindTree Public License
- For Approval: MindTree Public License
- new licensing model
- Let me reply to finalize discussion
- Question Regarding GPL
- Question Regarding GPL
- Question Regarding GPL
- Question Regarding GPL
- Question Regarding GPL
- Question Regarding GPL
- Question Regarding GPL
- Question Regarding GPL
- Question Regarding GPL
- Question Regarding GPL
- GPL v3
- GPL v3
- GPL v3
- Attribution Notices
- BitTorrent
- Re: [Ebxmlrr-tech] License issue with our customer]
- Re: [Ebxmlrr-tech] License issue with our customer]
- Re: [Ebxmlrr-tech] License issue with our customer]
- Re: [Ebxmlrr-tech] License issue with our customer]
- Re: [Ebxmlrr-tech] License issue with our customer]
- Re: Restriction on distribution by Novell?
- Re: Restriction on distribution by Novell?
- Re: APL license - What about the enforced logos?
- Re: APL license - What about the enforced logos?
- Re: APL license - What about the enforced logos?
- Re: APL license - What about the enforced logos?
- Re: APL license - What about the enforced logos?
- Re: APL license - What about the enforced logos?
- Re: APL license - What about the enforced logos?
- Re: APL license - What about the enforced logos?
- Re: APL license - What about the enforced logos?
- Re: APL license - What about the enforced logos?
- Re: APL license - What about the enforced logos?
- Re: ZDNet article - why attribution matters
- Re: ZDNet article - why attribution matters
- Re: ZDNet article - why attribution matters
- Re: ZDNet article - why attribution matters
- Re: ZDNet article - why attribution matters
- Re: APL license - What about the enforced logos?
- Re: APL license - What about the enforced logos?
- Re: APL license - What about the enforced logos?
- Re: APL license - What about the enforced logos?
- Re: APL license - What about the enforced logos?
- Re: APL license - What about the enforced logos?
- Re: Redefining GPL?
- Re: GPL for JS libraries (Was: Re: Redefining GPL?)
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: APL license - What about the enforced logos?
- Jbilling: Possible unauthorised use of OSI Certified service mark
- Re: Jbilling: Possible unauthorised use of OSI Certified service mark
- Re: Jbilling: Possible unauthorised use of OSI Certified service mark
- Re: Jbilling: Possible unauthorised use of OSI Certified service mark
- Dialogue with Intalio about GAP
- Re: Use of "open source"
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: Use of "open source"
- Re: Interesting note on attribution and OSD #10
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: non-military use license
- Re: Dispelling BSD License Misconceptions (fwd)
- Re: SocialText license discussion--call for closure of arguments
- Re: SocialText license discussion--call for closure of arguments
- Re: SocialText license discussion--call for closure of arguments
- Re: SocialText license discussion--call for closure of arguments
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
- Re: SocialText license discussion--call for closure of arguments
- Re: SocialText license discussion--call for closure of arguments
- Re: Request for Comment http://www.buni.org/mediawiki/index.php/GAP_Against
- Re: Request for Comment http://www.buni.org/mediawiki/index.php/GAP_Against
- Re: SocialText AGAINST paper wiki page
- Re: SocialText AGAINST paper wiki page
- Re: Request for Comment http://www.buni.org/mediawiki/index.php/GAP_Against
- Re: delite me from your mailing list
- Re: DELETE ME FROM THE MAILING LIST
- InfoWorld: Pentaho opens up further (Exhibit B to real MPL)
- Re: InfoWorld: Pentaho opens up further (Exhibit B to real MPL)
- Re: InfoWorld: Pentaho opens up further (Exhibit B to real MPL)
- Re: InfoWorld: Pentaho opens up further (Exhibit B to real MPL)
- Re: Ethical Restriction
- Re: Ethical Restriction
- Badgeware licences, Take Two (was: Ethical Restriction)
- Re: Badgeware licences, Take Two (was: Ethical Restriction)
- Re: Badgeware licences, Take Two
- Introducing Open Solutions Alliance
- Re: Introducing Open Solutions Alliance
- Re: Attribution & the Adaptive Public License
- Re: Attribution & the Adaptive Public License
- Re: Attribution & the Adaptive Public License
- Re: Introducing Open Solutions Alliance
- Followup on Exhibit B licences
- Re: Followup on Exhibit B licences
- Re: Followup on Exhibit B licences
- Re: Followup on Exhibit B licences
- Re: Followup on Exhibit B licences
- Re: Followup on Exhibit B licences
- Re: Followup on Exhibit B licences
- Re: Followup on Exhibit B licences
- Re: For Approval: Common Public Attribution License (CPAL)
- Re: when is an open source license open source?
- Re: when is an open source license open source?
- Re: For Approval: Common Public Attribution License (CPAL)
- Re: For Approval: Common Public Attribution License (CPAL)
- Re: For Approval: Open Source Hardware License
- Re: For Approval: Open Source Hardware License
- Re: For Approval: Open Source Hardware License
- Re: how much right do I have on my project, if there are patches by others?
- Re: how much right do I have on my project, if there are patches by others?
- Re: For Approval: Open Source Hardware License
- Re: how much right do I have on my project, if there are patches by others?
- Re: For Approval: Open Source Hardware License
- Re: how much right do I have on my project, if there are patches by others?
- Re: For Approval: Open Source Hardware License
- Re: For Approval: Open Source Hardware License
- Re: how much right do I have on my project, if there are patches by others?
- Re: how much right do I have on my project, if there are patches by others?
- Re: how much right do I have on my project, if there are patches by others?
- Re: why is taking open-source code closed expensive?
- Re: Do I need to inform my employer before contributing to an Open Source Project?
- Re: how much right do I have on my project, if there are patches by others?
- Re: how much right do I have on my project, if there are patches by others?
- Re: how much right do I have on my project, if there are patches by others?
- Re: how much right do I have on my project, if there are patches by others?
- Re: how much right do I have on my project, if there are patches by others?
- Re: how much right do I have on my project, if there are patches by others?
- Re: how much right do I have on my project, if there are patches by others?
- Re: License Committee Report for July 2007
- Re: License Committee Report for July 2007
- Re: OSI approves CPAL at OSCON 2007
- Re: OSI approves CPAL at OSCON 2007
- Re: OSI approves CPAL at OSCON 2007
- Re: conducting a sane and efficient GPLv3, LGPLv3 Review
- Re: conducting a sane and efficient GPLv3, LGPLv3 Review
- Re: conducting a sane and efficient GPLv3, LGPLv3 Review
- Re: conducting a sane and efficient GPLv3, LGPLv3 Review
- Re: conducting a sane and efficient GPLv3, LGPLv3 Review
- Re: conducting a sane and efficient GPLv3, LGPLv3 Review
- Re: what *is* the approval process?
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Community License
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: Combining GPL and non-GPL code
- Re: Combining GPL and non-GPL code
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: Concerns relating to the FSF and Future Licenses
- Re: Concerns relating to the FSF and Future Licenses
- Re: Combining GPL and non-GPL code
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- When will CPAL actually be _used_?
- Re: When will CPAL actually be _used_?
- Re: When will CPAL actually be _used_?
- Re: GPL-compatible vs Free was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?)
- Re: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?)
- Re: Groklaw's OSI item
- Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?))
- Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?))
- Re: We need list rules, was MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: We need list rules, was MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: We need list rules, was MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?))
- Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?))
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: Proposal for change to OSD#9
- Re: Proposal for change to OSD#9
- Re: Proposal for change to OSD#9
- Re: (OT) - Major Blow to Copyleft Theory