By: Chris Travers
- Re: Combining GPL and non-GPL code
- Re: Combining GPL and non-GPL code
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Community License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- BSDL/GPL v3 compatibility
- Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- We need list rules, was MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?))
- Re: We need list rules, was MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: We need list rules, was MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: We need list rules, was MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?))
- Re: Proposal for change to OSD#9
- Re: Proposal for change to OSD#9
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: Proposal for change to OSD#9
- Re: (OT) - Major Blow to Copyleft Theory
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: OT - GNU Contract Law Theory: ANTICIPATORY REPUDIATION
- Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?))
- Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: OT - GNU Contract Law Theory: ANTICIPATORY REPUDIATION
- Re: (OT) - Major Blow to Copyleft Theory
- Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?))
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: BSDL/GPL v3 compatibility
- Public Domain vs License, was For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: [OT] Noise filter, was: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: what *is* the approval process?
- Re: what *is* the approval process?
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Thoughts on approval process and license proliferation
- Re: Permissive license proliferation
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: [OT] Noise filter, was: For Approval: GPLv3
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: Using collective-work copyright to upgrade from GPL v2 to v3
- Re: Using collective-work copyright to upgrade from GPL v2 to v3
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: a plea
- Re: [META] a plea
- Re: [META] a plea
- Re: Automatic GPL termination
- Re: Automatic GPL termination
- Re: Automatic GPL termination
- Re: Automatic GPL termination
- Re: a plea
- Re: a plea
- Re: a plea
- Re: For Approval: Boost Software License - Version 1.0 - August 17th, 2003
- Re: For Approval: Boost Software License - Version 1.0 - August 17th, 2003
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: Automatic GPL termination
- Re: Automatic GPL termination
- Re: Off-topic Re: Automatic GPL termination
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: Scope of copyright on derivative works
- Re: Scope of copyright on derivative works
- Re: Scope of copyright on derivative works
- Re: Scope of copyright on derivative works
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: Scope of copyright on derivative works
- Re: Scope of copyright on derivative works
- Re: Promotion of derived products, the Microsoft case (was: Scope of copyright on derivative works)
- Re: Scope of copyright on derivative works
- Re: Promotion of derived products, the Microsoft case (was: Scope of copyright on derivative works)
- Re: Promotion of derived products, the Microsoft case (was: Scope of copyright on derivative works)
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Question on OSI position on BSD/MIT licenses
- Re: Question on OSI position on BSD/MIT licenses
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Public License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Public License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Reciprocal License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Reciprocal License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Public License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Public License
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Public License
- For Approval: BSD License, PostgreSQL Variant
- Re: For Approval: BSD License, PostgreSQL Variant
- Re: For Approval: BSD License, PostgreSQL Variant
- Re: For Approval: Microsoft Public License
- Re: For Approval: BSD License, PostgreSQL Variant
- Re: For Approval: BSD License, PostgreSQL Variant
- Re: For Approval: BSD License, PostgreSQL Variant
- Re: For Approval: BSD License, PostgreSQL Variant
- [OT] Fee-based certification of open source, was Re: For Approval: Boost Software License - Version 1.0 - August 17th, 2003
- Re: For Approval: BSD License, PostgreSQL Variant
- Re: For Approval: BSD License, PostgreSQL Variant
- Re: BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process
- Re: For Approval: BSD License, PostgreSQL Variant
- BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process
- Re: BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process
- Re: For Approval: Boost Software License - Version 1.0 - August 17th, 2003
- Re: BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process
- Re: BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process
- Re: For Approval: BSD License, PostgreSQL Variant
- Re: For Approval: BSD License, PostgreSQL Variant
- Re: BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process
- Re: Frameworx license clause 3b
- Re: BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process
- Re: BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process
- Re: BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process
- Re: BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process
- Re: BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process
- Re: BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process
- Re: BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process
- Re: BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process
- Re: BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process
- Re: AFL source code obligation
- Re: BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process
- Re: BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process
- Re: rms@1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that...
- Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI
- Re: Communication skills
- Re: Communication skills
- Re: Communication skills
- Re: Communication skills
- Re: Microsoft's Open Source Licenses
- Re: Microsoft's Open Source Licenses
- Re: For Approval: MLL (minimal library license)
- Re: For Approval: MLL (minimal library license)
- Re: For Approval: MLL (minimal library license)
- [OT?] GPL v3 FUD, was For Approval: MLL (minimal library license)
- Re: [OT?] GPL v3 FUD, was For Approval: MLL (minimal library license)
- Re: [OT?] GPL v3 FUD, was For Approval: MLL (minimal library license)
- Re: [OT] For Approval: MLL (minimal library license)
- Re: FOR APPROVAL: The license of Multics
- Re: Improving the License Approval Proces (Was: FOR APPROVAL: The license of Multics)
- Re: Communication skills
- Re: Communication skills
- Re: Communication skills
- Re: Communication skills
- Re: Communication skills
- Re: Communication skills
- Re: Communication skills
- Re: Communication skills
- Re: Code of Conduct
- Re: Open Source vs opensource
- Re: MS-RL equivalents?
- Re: MS-RL equivalents?
- Re: Call for Votes: New OSI-Editors List
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: ECL 2.0 and New Questions!
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: ECL 2.0 and New Questions!
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: public? Re: Call for Votes: New OSI-Editors List
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: Call for Votes: New OSI-Editors List
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: public? Re: Call for Votes: New OSI-Editors List
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: public? Re: Call for Votes: New OSI-Editors List
- license categories, was: I'm not supposed to use the ECL v2?
- Re: license categories, was: I'm not supposed to use the ECL v2?
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: Editorial Board
- Re: Open CASCADE Technology Public License
- Re: license categories, was: I'm not supposed to use the ECL v2?
- Re: license categories, was: I'm not supposed to use the ECL v2?
- Status update request
- Re: Question about documentation and patents
- Re: [OT?] GPL v3 FUD, was For Approval: MLL (minimal library license)
- Re: [OT?] GPL v3 FUD, was For Approval: MLL (minimal library license)
- Re: [OT?] GPL v3 FUD, was For Approval: MLL (minimal library license)
- Re: license categories, was: I'm not supposed to use the ECL v2?
- Re: [OT?] GPL v3 FUD, was For Approval: MLL (minimal library license)
- Re: license categories, was: I'm not supposed to use the ECL v2?
- Re: Take 3: Editors and Trackers
- Re: license categories, was: I'm not supposed to use the ECL v2?
- Re: license categories, was: I'm not supposed to use the ECL v2?
- Re: When to evaluate dual licenses (was: license categories, was: I'm not supposed to use the ECL v2?)
- Re: When to evaluate dual licenses (was: license categories, was: I'm not supposed to use the ECL v2?)
- Re: When to evaluate dual licenses (was: license categories, was: I'm not supposed to use the ECL v2?)
- Re: Take 3: Editors and Trackers
- Re: Take 3: Editors and Trackers
- Re: When to evaluate dual licenses
- Re: When to evaluate dual licenses
- Re: When to evaluate dual licenses
- Re: Take 3: Editors and Trackers
- Re: EULA and Modifed BSD
- Re: Question about documentation and patents
- Re: EULA and Modifed BSD
- Re: license categories, was: I'm not supposed to use the ECL v2?
- Re: When to evaluate dual licenses
- Re: When to evaluate dual licenses
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: EULA and Modifed BSD
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: EULA and Modifed BSD
- Forced distribution licenses (AGPL/OSL/etc): Why not.
- Re: When to evaluate dual licenses
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: Question on OSD #5
- Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source"