By: Karl Fogel

April 2011

• Re: Accidental Public License?
• Re: Looking for OSI approval of license
• Re: Looking for OSI approval of license
• Re: Looking for OSI approval of license
• Re: Looking for OSI approval of license
• Pending OSI License Committee work?
• Re: Pending OSI License Committee work?
• Re: Pending OSI License Committee work?
• Re: Towards an OSI-approved "waive all rights" software license
• Re: Multi-license - won't it conflict?
• OSI approval of 2-clause BSD license?
• Re: Multi-license - won't it conflict?
• Re: Towards an OSI-approved "waive all rights" software license
• Re: Perl Tk license
• Re: openbravo license: another variant of the MPL
• Re: NASA Open Source Agreement v1.3

May 2011

• NASA requests help finding gov't use of standard OSS licenses.
• Re: NASA requests help finding gov't use of standard OSS licenses.
• Re: Unique identifier for licenses
• Re: NASA requests help finding gov't use of standard OSS licenses.
• Re: NASA requests help finding gov't use of standard OSS licenses.
• Re: NASA requests help finding gov't use of standard OSS licenses.
• Re: Artistic License
• Re: NASA requests help finding gov't use of standard OSS licenses.
• Re: Artistic License

June 2011

• Re: My mail about Python licensing did not go through?
• Re: Naming of the Python vs PSF licenses.
• The Python licensing situation.
• Re: The Python licensing situation.
• Re: The Python licensing situation.
• Re: Cecill License
• Re: The Python licensing situation.
• Re: The Python licensing situation.
• Re: Synchronization of SPDX and OSI license identifiers.

August 2011

• Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose.
• Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose.
• Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose.
• Re: commercial distribution
• Re: commercial distribution
• OSI license@ lists upgrade this Friday (addresses not changing).
• Re: commercial distribution
• Re: MPL RC1 posted to license-review
• Re: Terekhov [was Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose.]
• Re: Terekhov
• Re: Offering secondary nameservice
• Re: FOR APPROVAL - Python License Changes
• Re: The Python licensing situation.
• Re: FOR APPROVAL - Python License Changes

September 2011

• EPICS Open License (U.S. gov't DOE / ANL project).
• Re: EPICS Open License (U.S. gov't DOE / ANL project).
• Can OSI specify that public domain is open source?
• Re: Can OSI specify that public domain is open source?
• Re: Can OSI specify that public domain is open source?
• Re: Can OSI specify that public domain is open source?
• Re: Can OSI specify that public domain is open source?
• Re: Can OSI specify that public domain is open source?
• Re: Can OSI specify that public domain is open source?
• Re: Can OSI specify that public domain is open source?
• Re: Can OSI specify that public domain is open source?
• Re: Can OSI specify that public domain is open source?
• Re: Can OSI specify that public domain is open source?
• Re: Can OSI specify that public domain is open source?
• Re: Can OSI specify that public domain is open source?
• Re: Can OSI specify that public domain is open source?
• Re: Can OSI specify that public domain is open source?
• Re: Can OSI specify that public domain is open source?

---