Messages 101xx


00: Re: CDDL vs. MPL assymmetry (was Re: Mistaken statement about MPL?) (Alex Bligh)
01: Re: Amdahl's law and non-proliferation (Bruce Perens)
02: Re: "viral" (was RE: Licensing options for firmware) (Benjamin Rossen)
03: Re: CDDL vs. MPL assymmetry (was Re: Mistaken statement about MPL?) (Mitchell Baker)
04: Re: CDDL vs. MPL assymmetry (was Re: Mistaken statement about MPL?) (Forrest J. Cavalier III)
05: asymmetry? (Brian Behlendorf)
06: Re: asymmetry? (Michael Poole)
07: Re: asymmetry? (Michael R. Bernstein)
08: Re: asymmetry? (Brian Behlendorf)
09: Re: OSI's war on corporate licenses (Brian Behlendorf)
10: Re: asymmetry? (Danese Cooper)
11: Re: asymmetry? (Joel West)
12: Re: asymmetry? (Brian Behlendorf)
13: Re: OSI's war on corporate licenses (Danese Cooper)
14: Re: asymmetry? (David Dillard)
15: Re: asymmetry? (Brian Behlendorf)
16: Re: asymmetry? (Danese Cooper)
17: Re: OSI's war on corporate licenses (Claire Giordano)
18: Re: asymmetry? (Rick Moen)
19: Re: asymmetry? (Michael R. Bernstein)
20: Re: asymmetry? (Nick Moffitt)
21: Re: asymmetry? (Rob Lanphier)
22: OSL 2.1 for textbooks (Sanjoy Mahajan)
23: Re: asymmetry? (Fabian Bastin)
24: Re: asymmetry? (Alex Bligh)
25: Re: OSL 2.1 for textbooks (Wilson, Andrew)
26: Re: OSL 2.1 for textbooks (Brendan Scott)
27: Re: OSL 2.1 for textbooks (Sanjoy Mahajan)
28: Re: OSL 2.1 for textbooks (Lawrence Rosen)
29: Re: OSI's war on corporate licenses (Peterson, Scott K (HP Legal))
30: No RAND in OASIS (Lawrence Rosen)
31: Re: No RAND in OASIS (David Webber \(XML\))
32: Best licence for my software? (NSK)
33: Re: Best licence for my software? (Matthew Seth Flaschen)
34: Re: Best licence for my software? (Alex Bligh)
35: Re: Best licence for my software? (Matthew Seth Flaschen)
36: Re: Best licence for my software? (Matthew Seth Flaschen)
37: Re: Best licence for my software? (Arnoud Engelfriet)
38: Re: Best licence for my software? (David Dillard)
39: Re: Best licence for my software? (John Cowan)
40: Re: Best licence for my software? (Alex Bligh)
41: Re: Best licence for my software? (Alex Bligh)
42: Re: Best licence for my software? (David Dillard)
43: Re: Official License Anti-Proliferation policy? (Laura Majerus)
44: license proliferation committee charter (Laura Majerus)
45: license proliferation committee charter (Laura Majerus)
46: Re: Best licence for my software? (Alex Bligh)
47: What is the best copy-left license for a library if you want to allow linking? (Brant Sears)
48: Re: What is the best copy-left license for a library if you want to allow linking? (John Cowan)
49: Re: asymmetry? (Bruce Perens)
50: Re: OSI's war on corporate licenses (Bruce Perens)
51: Fork-prevention in the GPL (Bruce Perens)
52: Re: OSL 2.1 for textbooks (Bruce Perens)
53: Re: What is the best copy-left license for a library if you want to allow linking? (Wilson, Andrew)
54: Re: Fork-prevention in the GPL (Brendan Scott)
55: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Chris Zumbrunn)
56: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (John Cowan)
57: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Chris Zumbrunn)
58: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Chuck Swiger)
59: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (John Cowan)
60: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Chris Zumbrunn)
61: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Chris Zumbrunn)
62: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Thorsten Glaser)
63: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Alex Bligh)
64: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Thorsten Glaser)
65: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (John Cowan)
66: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Alex Bligh)
67: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Chris Zumbrunn)
68: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Chris Zumbrunn)
69: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (John Cowan)
70: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Bruce Perens)
71: Build bright lines (Bruce Perens)
72: Why do you need copy-back? (Bruce Perens)
73: Re: Why do you need copy-back? (Chris Zumbrunn)
74: Re: Build bright lines (Chris Zumbrunn)
75: Re: Why do you need copy-back? (Bruce Perens)
76: Re: Build bright lines (Bruce Perens)
77: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Chris Zumbrunn)
78: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Thorsten Glaser)
79: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Bruce Perens)
80: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Bruce Perens)
81: Re: Why do you need copy-back? (Sanjoy Mahajan)
82: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (cody koeninger)
83: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Bruce Perens)
84: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Gregory Aharonian)
85: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Lawrence Rosen)
86: ASP use (was Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion) (Alex Bligh)
87: Re: ASP use (was Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion) (Chris Zumbrunn)
88: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (John Cowan)
89: Patent Act of 2005 (Bruce Perens)
90: Re: Patent Act of 2005 (John Cowan)
91: Re: Patent Act of 2005 (Bruce Perens)
92: Re: Patent Act of 2005 (John Cowan)
93: Re: Patent Act of 2005 (Bruce Perens)
94: Re: Patent Act of 2005 (Will Rodger)
95: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (Gregory Aharonian)
96: Aharonian's theory of non-copyrightability of software (Bruce Perens)
97: Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion (John Cowan)
98: Jurisdictional neutrality (was Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion) (Brendan Scott)
99: Re: Jurisdictional neutrality (was Re: Copy-Back License draft for discussion) (cody koeninger)