Messages 135xx


00: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Donovan Hawkins)
01: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Community License (Chris Travers)
02: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Donovan Hawkins)
03: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Michael R. Bernstein)
04: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Community License (Matthew Flaschen)
05: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Chris Travers)
06: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (John Cowan)
07: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (John Cowan)
08: Re: When will CPAL actually be _used_? (Ross Mayfield)
09: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Matthew Flaschen)
10: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Chris Travers)
11: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Chris Travers)
12: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Donovan Hawkins)
13: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Matthew Flaschen)
14: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Matthew Flaschen)
15: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Chris Travers)
16: GPL-compatible vs Free was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Chris Travers)
17: Re: When will CPAL actually be _used_? (Ashlee Vance)
18: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Nils Labugt)
19: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Nils Labugt)
20: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Nils Labugt)
21: Re: GPL-compatible vs Free was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Donovan Hawkins)
22: Re: GPL-compatible vs Free was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Chris Travers)
23: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Wilson, Andrew)
24: Re: When will CPAL actually be _used_? (Rick Moen)
25: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Chris Travers)
26: Re: GPL-compatible vs Free was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Rick Moen)
27: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Chris Travers)
28: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Matthew Flaschen)
29: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Chris Travers)
30: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Tobia Conforto)
31: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Nils Labugt)
32: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Tobia Conforto)
33: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?) (Rick Moen)
34: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Chris Travers)
35: Re: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?) (Cinly Ooi)
36: Re: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?) (Rick Moen)
37: Re: Groklaw's OSI item (Matthew Flaschen)
38: Re: Groklaw's OSI item (Rick Moen)
39: Re: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?) (Brian Behlendorf)
40: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Tobia Conforto)
41: Re: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?) (Mike Milinkovich)
42: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Chris Travers)
43: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Tobia Conforto)
44: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Chris Travers)
45: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Chris Fagan)
46: Re: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?) (Simon Phipps)
47: (OT) - what does Ashlee Vance have against knitting in public? (Danese Cooper)
48: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Zac Bowling)
49: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?)) (Michael R. Bernstein)
50: Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?)) (Rick Moen)
51: Re: GPL-compatible vs Free was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Dalibor Topic)
52: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Tobia Conforto)
53: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
54: Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?)) (Michael Tiemann)
55: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Michael Tiemann)
56: Re: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?) (John Cowan)
57: Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?)) (John Cowan)
58: Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?)) (John Cowan)
59: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Chris Travers)
60: Re: GPL-compatible vs Free was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Wilson, Andrew)
61: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Wilson, Andrew)
62: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (John Cowan)
63: Re: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?) (Mike Milinkovich)
64: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Alexander Terekhov)
65: Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?)) (Michael R. Bernstein)
66: Re: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?) (Simon Phipps)
67: Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?)) (Alexander Terekhov)
68: Re: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?) (Mike Milinkovich)
69: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Wilson, Andrew)
70: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Thatcher, Jim E. (Woodcock Washburn))
71: Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?)) (Thatcher, Jim E. (Woodcock Washburn))
72: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Alexander Terekhov)
73: Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?)) (John Cowan)
74: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Wilson, Andrew)
75: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Matthew Flaschen)
76: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Matthew Flaschen)
77: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Matthew Flaschen)
78: Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?)) (Nils Labugt)
79: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Chris Travers)
80: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Matthew Flaschen)
81: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Matthew Flaschen)
82: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Alexander Terekhov)
83: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Matthew Flaschen)
84: Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?)) (Matthew Flaschen)
85: Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?)) (John Cowan)
86: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Chris Travers)
87: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Matthew Flaschen)
88: Re: Groklaw's OSI item (Matthew Flaschen)
89: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Matthew Flaschen)
90: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Matthew Flaschen)
91: Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?)) (Matthew Flaschen)
92: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Chris Travers)
93: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Alexander Terekhov)
94: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Matthew Flaschen)
95: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Matthew Flaschen)
96: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Matthew Flaschen)
97: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Alexander Terekhov)
98: Re: MS-PL/GPL compatibility, was Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License (Chris Travers)
99: Re: License compatibility of MS-PL and MS-CL (Was: (RE: Groklaw's OSI item (was: When will CPAL actually be _used_?)) (Nils Labugt)