Messages 146xx


00: Re: Microsoft claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (John Cowan)
01: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
02: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Danese Cooper)
03: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Bill Hilf)
04: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Alexander Terekhov)
05: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Alexander Terekhov)
06: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Cinly Ooi)
07: rms@1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that... [was: Re: Microsoft claiming...] (Alexander Terekhov)
08: Re: rms@1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that... [was: Re: Microsoft claiming...] (Ernest Prabhakar)
09: Re: BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process (Ben Tilly)
10: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
11: Re: rms@1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that... (Alexander Terekhov)
12: Re: rms@1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that... (Alexander Terekhov)
13: Re: rms@1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that... (Donovan Hawkins)
14: Re: rms@1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that... (Chris Travers)
15: Re: rms@1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that... (Alexander Terekhov)
16: Re: rms@1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that... (Alexander Terekhov)
17: Re: rms@1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that... (Matthew Flaschen)
18: Re: rms@1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that... (Alexander Terekhov)
19: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (B Galliart)
20: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Rick Moen)
21: Re: rms@1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that... (Rick Moen)
22: Re: rms@1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that... (Alexander Terekhov)
23: Re: rms@1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that... (Lawrence Rosen)
24: Re: rms@1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that... (Matthew Flaschen)
25: Re: rms@1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that... (Rick Moen)
26: Re: rms@1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that... (Matthew Flaschen)
27: Re: rms@1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that... (Alexander Terekhov)
28: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Rui Miguel Silva Seabra)
29: Re: Microsoft claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Rui Miguel Silva Seabra)
30: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Alexander Terekhov)
31: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Sam Ramji)
32: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Matthew Flaschen)
33: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Alexander Terekhov)
34: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Mahesh T. Pai)
35: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Alexander Terekhov)
36: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Mahesh T. Pai)
37: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Alexander Terekhov)
38: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Arnoud Engelfriet)
39: A priori IPR choices for IETF specifications (Lawrence Rosen)
40: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Michael Tiemann)
41: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Alexander Terekhov)
42: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Philippe Verdy)
43: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Rodent of Unusual Size)
44: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Alexander Terekhov)
45: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Chris Travers)
46: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Rodent of Unusual Size)
47: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Alexander Terekhov)
48: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Rodent of Unusual Size)
49: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Rui Miguel Silva Seabra)
50: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Alexander Terekhov)
51: Re: Blogger claiming "shared source" is approved by OSI (Robin 'Roblimo' Miller)
52: Re: A priori IPR choices (Lawrence Rosen)
53: Re: A priori IPR choices (Philippe Verdy)
54: Re: BSD-like licenses and the OSI approval process (Alexander Terekhov)
55: Re: FYI 28 (was: A priori IPR choices) (Hallam-Baker, Phillip)
56: Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil (Russ Nelson)
57: Re: Patents can be for good, not only evil (Alexander Terekhov)
58: Communication skills (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
59: Re: Communication skills (Justin Clift)
60: Re: Communication skills (Russ Nelson)
61: Re: Communication skills (Chris Travers)
62: Re: Communication skills (Ernest Prabhakar)
63: Re: Communication skills (Chris Travers)
64: Re: Communication skills (Ben Tilly)
65: Re: Communication skills (Chris Travers)
66: Re: Communication skills (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
67: Re: Communication skills (Russ Nelson)
68: Re: Communication skills (Rodent of Unusual Size)
69: Re: Communication skills (Matthew Flaschen)
70: Re: Communication skills (Chris Travers)
71: Re: Communication skills (Matthew Flaschen)
72: Re: Communication skills (Lam YongXian)
73: Re: Communication skills (justin.postgresql.org)
74: Microsoft's Open Source Licenses (Jon Rosenberg (PBM))
75: Re: Microsoft's Open Source Licenses (Matthew Flaschen)
76: Re: Microsoft's Open Source Licenses (Forrest J. Cavalier III)
77: Re: Microsoft's Open Source Licenses (Sam Ramji)
78: Re: Microsoft's Open Source Licenses (Donovan Hawkins)
79: Re: Microsoft's Open Source Licenses (Cinly Ooi)
80: Re: Microsoft's Open Source Licenses (Chris Travers)
81: Hiring Re: Communication skills (Ernest Prabhakar)
82: Re: Microsoft's Open Source Licenses (Jon Rosenberg (PBM))
83: Re: Microsoft's Open Source Licenses (Michael Tiemann)
84: Re: Microsoft's Open Source Licenses (Matthew Flaschen)
85: Re: Microsoft's Open Source Licenses (Simon Phipps)
86: Re: Microsoft's Open Source Licenses (Chris Travers)
87: Re: Microsoft's Open Source Licenses (Simon Phipps)
88: Re: Microsoft's Open Source Licenses (Simon Phipps)
89: Withdrawn: Open Source Hardware License (Jamey Hicks)
90: For Approval: MLL (minimal library license) (rlyeh)
91: Re: For Approval: MLL (minimal library license) (Zak Greant)
92: Re: For Approval: MLL (minimal library license) (David Woolley)
93: Re: For Approval: MLL (minimal library license) (David Woolley)
94: Re: For Approval: MLL (minimal library license) (Zak Greant)
95: Re: For Approval: MLL (minimal library license) (David Woolley)
96: Re: For Approval: MLL (minimal library license) (Matthew Flaschen)
97: Re: Communication skills (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
98: What should the License Result Communication Process be? (Justin Clift)
99: Re: For Approval: MLL (minimal library license) (John Cowan)