Messages 151xx


00: Re: EULA and Modifed BSD (Russ Nelson)
01: Re: EULA and Modifed BSD (Norman Young)
02: Re: EULA and Modifed BSD (David Woolley)
03: No license approval action this month (Russ Nelson)
04: Welcome to the *new* License Discuss (Ernest Prabhakar)
05: Re: EULA and Modifed BSD (Matthew Flaschen)
06: Re: Question about documentation and patents (Matthew Flaschen)
07: Re: license categories, was: I'm not supposed to use the ECL v2? (Matthew Flaschen)
08: Re: license categories, was: I'm not supposed to use the ECL v2? (Matthew Flaschen)
09: Re: license categories, was: I'm not supposed to use the ECL v2? (Matthew Flaschen)
10: Re: license categories, was: I'm not supposed to use the ECL v2? (Matthew Flaschen)
11: Re: When to evaluate dual licenses (Matthew Flaschen)
12: Re: license categories, was: I'm not supposed to use the ECL v2? (Chris Travers)
13: Re: When to evaluate dual licenses (Matthew Flaschen)
14: Re: When to evaluate dual licenses (Matthew Flaschen)
15: Re: When to evaluate dual licenses (Chris Travers)
16: Re: When to evaluate dual licenses (Matthew Flaschen)
17: Re: license categories, was: I'm not supposed to use the ECL v2? (Matthew Flaschen)
18: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Matthew Flaschen)
19: Re: When to evaluate dual licenses (Chuck Swiger)
20: Re: When to evaluate dual licenses (Chris Travers)
21: Re: When to evaluate dual licenses (Matthew Flaschen)
22: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Chris Travers)
23: Re: When to evaluate dual licenses (Matthew Flaschen)
24: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Matthew Flaschen)
25: Re: When to evaluate dual licenses (Chuck Swiger)
26: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Tzeng, Nigel H.)
27: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Matthew Flaschen)
28: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Lawrence Rosen)
29: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Matthew Flaschen)
30: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Tzeng, Nigel H.)
31: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Tzeng, Nigel H.)
32: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Lawrence Rosen)
33: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Tzeng, Nigel H.)
34: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Tzeng, Nigel H.)
35: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Chris Travers)
36: Re: Question on OSD #5 (John Cowan)
37: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Chris Travers)
38: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Chris Travers)
39: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Matthew Flaschen)
40: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Matthew Flaschen)
41: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Matthew Flaschen)
42: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Matthew Flaschen)
43: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Chris Travers)
44: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Matthew Flaschen)
45: Re: EULA and Modifed BSD (David Woolley)
46: Re: EULA and Modifed BSD (Matthew Flaschen)
47: Re: EULA and Modifed BSD (Chris Travers)
48: Re: FOR APPROVAL: The license of Multics (Russ Nelson)
49: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Ernest Prabhakar)
50: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Lawrence Rosen)
51: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Chris Travers)
52: Re: EULA and Modifed BSD (Matthew Flaschen)
53: Re: EULA and Modifed BSD (Chris Travers)
54: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Matthew Flaschen)
55: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Matthew Flaschen)
56: Re: EULA and Modifed BSD (Matthew Flaschen)
57: Re: FOR APPROVAL: The license of Multics (Matthew Flaschen)
58: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Ernest Prabhakar)
59: Forced distribution licenses (AGPL/OSL/etc): Why not. (Chris Travers)
60: Re: Forced distribution licenses (AGPL/OSL/etc): Why not. (Chris Zumbrunn)
61: Re: When to evaluate dual licenses (Michael Tiemann)
62: Re: When to evaluate dual licenses (Michael Poole)
63: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
64: Re: When to evaluate dual licenses (Chris Travers)
65: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Chris Travers)
66: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Arnoud Engelfriet)
67: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Chris Travers)
68: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Arnoud Engelfriet)
69: Re: Forced distribution licenses (AGPL/OSL/etc): Why not. (Ernest Prabhakar)
70: Is license dennying redstribution open source? (petr.pisar.atlas.cz)
71: Re: Is license dennying redstribution open source? (Philip Hunt)
72: Re: Is license dennying redstribution open source? (petr.pisar.atlas.cz)
73: Re: Is license dennying redstribution open source? (Eugene Wee)
74: Re: Question on OSD #5 (Romain Berrendonner)
75: Re: Is license dennying redstribution open source? (Matthew Flaschen)
76: Re: Is license dennying redstribution open source? (Ben Tilly)
77: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source" (B Galliart)
78: Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source" (Chris Travers)
79: Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source" (John Cowan)
80: Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source" (Tzeng, Nigel H.)
81: Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source" (Jamie Cannon)
82: Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source" (Rick Moen)
83: Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source" (Russ Nelson)
84: Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source" (Matthew Flaschen)
85: Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source" (Russ Nelson)
86: Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source" (Matthew Flaschen)
87: OSI enforcement? (Was Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source") (B Galliart)
88: Re: OSI enforcement? (Was Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source") (zooko)
89: Re: OSI enforcement? (Was Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source") (Rick Moen)
90: Re: OSI enforcement? (Was Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source") (John Cowan)
91: Re: OSI enforcement? (Was Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source") (Russ Nelson)
92: Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source" (Russ Nelson)
93: Re: OSI enforcement? (Was Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source") (Tzeng, Nigel H.)
94: Re: OSI enforcement? (Was Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source") (Russ Nelson)
95: Code of Conduct for OSI Mailing Lists (Tzeng, Nigel H.)
96: Re: OSI enforcement? (Was Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source") (John Cowan)
97: Re: OSI enforcement? (Was Re: Microsoft use of the term "Open Source") (Russ Nelson)
98: New Moderation Policy Re: Code of Conduct for OSI Mailing Lists (Ernest Prabhakar)
99: Re: Code of Conduct for OSI Mailing Lists (Russ Nelson)