Messages 156xx


00: Re: Open Source Licenses and Embrace-Extend-Extinguish (msibley.itoperators.com)
01: Re: Open Source Licenses and Embrace-Extend-Extinguish (Chris DiBona)
02: Re: encforceability of Open Source Licences (Re: (OT) - NOT A Major Blow to Copyleft Theory) (Russ Nelson)
03: Re: Open Source Licenses and Embrace-Extend-Extinguish (Arnoud Engelfriet)
04: Re: Open Source Licenses and Embrace-Extend-Extinguish (David Woolley)
05: Re: Open Source Licenses and Embrace-Extend-Extinguish (msibley.itoperators.com)
06: Re: Open Source Licenses and Embrace-Extend-Extinguish (Matthew Flaschen)
07: Re: Open Source Licenses and Embrace-Extend-Extinguish (Matthew Flaschen)
08: Re: Open Source Licenses and Embrace-Extend-Extinguish (Matthew Flaschen)
09: Re: Open Source Licenses and Embrace-Extend-Extinguish (Alexander Terekhov)
10: Re: Open Source Licenses and Embrace-Extend-Extinguish (Rod Dixon)
11: Re: encforceability of Open Source Licences (Re: (OT) - NOT A Major Blow to Copyleft Theory) (Alexander Terekhov)
12: OSI Logo - Terms of Use (David Abrahams)
13: Re: OSI Logo - Terms of Use (David Woolley)
14: Re: OSI Logo - Terms of Use (Donovan Hawkins)
15: LGPL Help (John Drakes)
16: Re: LGPL Help (Chuck Swiger)
17: Re: OSI Logo - Terms of Use (Russ Nelson)
18: Re: License committee report for January 2008 (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
19: Public domain software is not open-source? (Alexander Terekhov)
20: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Tzeng, Nigel H.)
21: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Matthew Flaschen)
22: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Rick Moen)
23: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Matthew Flaschen)
24: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Rick Moen)
25: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Matthew Flaschen)
26: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Rick Moen)
27: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Kai-Uwe Behrmann)
28: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Nick Moffitt)
29: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (John Cowan)
30: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Rick Moen)
31: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Alexander Terekhov)
32: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Ernest Prabhakar)
33: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Alexander Terekhov)
34: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Tzeng, Nigel H.)
35: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Lawrence Rosen)
36: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Alexander Terekhov)
37: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (John Cowan)
38: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Alexander Terekhov)
39: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Alexander Terekhov)
40: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Lawrence Rosen)
41: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Alexander Terekhov)
42: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (DShofi.atmi.com)
43: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Rick Moen)
44: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Rick Moen)
45: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Philippe Verdy)
46: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Alexander Terekhov)
47: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Alexander Terekhov)
48: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Matthew Flaschen)
49: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Rick Moen)
50: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Matthew Flaschen)
51: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Alexander Terekhov)
52: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Philippe Verdy)
53: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Matthew Flaschen)
54: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Matthew Flaschen)
55: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Alexander Terekhov)
56: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Gustavo G. Mármol)
57: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Philippe Verdy)
58: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (John Cowan)
59: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Eugene Wee)
60: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Philippe Verdy)
61: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Arnoud Engelfriet)
62: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Philippe Verdy)
63: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Matthew Flaschen)
64: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Philippe Verdy)
65: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Matthew Flaschen)
66: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Matthew Flaschen)
67: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Philippe Verdy)
68: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Romain Berrendonner)
69: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Matthew Flaschen)
70: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Matthew Flaschen)
71: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Philippe Verdy)
72: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Alexander Terekhov)
73: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Ben Tilly)
74: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Alexander Terekhov)
75: Re: Public domain software is not open-source? (Alexander Terekhov)
76: MS continued attack on OSD #6 (B Galliart)
77: Re: MS continued attack on OSD #6 (Rick Moen)
78: Re: MS continued attack on OSD #6 (B Galliart)
79: Affero Licence/AGPL (Ryan Cross)
80: Re: Affero Licence/AGPL (Ben Tilly)
81: Re: Affero Licence/AGPL (Chris DiBona)
82: Re: MS continued attack on OSD #6 (Rick Moen)
83: Re: Affero Licence/AGPL (Ryan Cross)
84: Re: Affero Licence/AGPL (Chris DiBona)
85: Re: Affero Licence/AGPL (Matthew Flaschen)
86: Re: MS continued attack on OSD #6 (Jamie Cannon)
87: Re: Affero Licence/AGPL (Ryan Cross)
88: What is considered off-site usage? (Dirk Dierickx)
89: Re: What is considered off-site usage? (Matthew Flaschen)
90: Re: What is considered off-site usage? (Chuck Swiger)
91: Re: What is considered off-site usage? (John Cowan)
92: Re: What is considered off-site usage? (Matthew Flaschen)
93: Re: What is considered off-site usage? (John Cowan)
94: Re: What is considered off-site usage? (Wilson, Andrew)
95: Re: Affero Licence/AGPL (Matthew Flaschen)
96: Re: Affero Licence/AGPL (Alexander Terekhov)
97: Censure Re: Affero Licence/AGPL (Ernest Prabhakar)
98: Re: Censure Re: Affero Licence/AGPL (Alexander Terekhov)
99: Re: Censure Re: Affero Licence/AGPL (Michael Tiemann)