Messages 165xx


00: Re: Clean room reverse engineering (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
01: Re: Clean room reverse engineering] (Vlad Stanimir)
02: Re: Clean room reverse engineering (Matthew Flaschen)
03: Re: Clean room reverse engineering (Chris Travers)
04: Re: Clean room reverse engineering (Michael Tiemann)
05: Re: Clean room reverse engineering (Marc Whipple)
06: Re: Clean room reverse engineering (Remco)
07: Re: Clean room reverse engineering (Remco)
08: Re: Clean room reverse engineering (David Woolley)
09: Re: Clean room reverse engineering (Marc Whipple)
10: Re: Clean room reverse engineering (Chris Travers)
11: Re: Clean room reverse engineering (Vlad Stanimir)
12: Re: Clean room reverse engineering (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
13: OKL4 license (Lawrence Rosen)
14: Re: OKL4 license (Russ Nelson)
15: Re: OKL4 license (Vlad Stanimir)
16: I think you'll like it! (Mr SZ)
17: Conferece survey in Brazil about on open-source and/or affordable digital manufacturing technologies (Arnaldo Luis Lixandro Filho)
18: updating the GPL's status in http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category ? (Luis Villa)
19: Re: updating the GPL's status in http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category ? (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
20: Re: updating the GPL's status in http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category ? (Raj Mathur)
21: Re: updating the GPL's status in http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category ? (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
22: Re: updating the GPL's status in http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category ? (Mahesh T. Pai)
23: Re: updating the GPL's status in http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category ? (John Cowan)
24: Re: updating the GPL's status in http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category ? (Mahesh T. Pai)
25: Re: updating the GPL's status in http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category ? (Bjrn Terelius)
26: Re: updating the GPL's status in http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category ? (Chris Travers)
27: Re: updating the GPL's status in http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category ? (John Cowan)
28: Re: updating the GPL's status in http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category ? (Luis Villa)
29: Re: updating the GPL's status in http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category ? (Chris Travers)
30: Re: updating the GPL's status in http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category ? (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
31: Re: updating the GPL's status in http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category ? (Vlad Stanimir)
32: Re: updating the GPL's status in http://www.opensource.org/licenses/category ? (Chris Travers)
33: La banque a retir 397 Euros sur votre compte. (Service Bancaire)
34: New patent on license conflicts detection process (Bani)
35: Re: New patent on license conflicts detection process (John Cowan)
36: Re: New patent on license conflicts detection process (Ben Tilly)
37: Re: New patent on license conflicts detection process (Chris DiBona)
38: Re: New patent on license conflicts detection process (John Cowan)
39: Re: New patent on license conflicts detection process (Ben Tilly)
40: Releasing JUnit tests for GPL code (Thomas Laut)
41: Re: Releasing JUnit tests for GPL code (John Cowan)
42: ozlem BASKAN (Donnal Walter)
43: Which license to choose? (Kevin Hunter)
44: Re: Which license to choose? (David Woolley)
45: Licensing question (Clayton Dukes)
46: Re: Licensing question (Bani)
47: Re: Licensing question (Mahesh T. Pai)
48: Re: Licensing question (Clayton Dukes)
49: Re: Which license to choose? (John Cowan)
50: Re: Which license to choose? (Kevin Hunter)
51: Re: Licensing question (Mark James)
52: Re: Licensing question (Gwyn Murray)
53: Re: Which license to choose? (David Woolley)
54: Re: Licensing question (John Cowan)
55: Re: Which license to choose? (John Cowan)
56: Re: Which license to choose? (Ben Tilly)
57: Re: Which license to choose? (Chuck Swiger)
58: Re: Which license to choose? (David Shofi)
59: Re: Which license to choose? (Chris Aniszczyk)
60: Re: Which license to choose? (David Shofi)
61: Re: Licensing question (Chris Travers)
62: Re: Which license to choose? (Tzeng, Nigel H.)
63: Re: Licensing question (Mark James)
64: Re: Licensing question (Mark James)
65: Re: Licensing question (Chris Travers)
66: Doubt concerning releasing code anonymously (Andr Barbosa)
67: Re: Doubt concerning releasing code anonymously (Chris Travers)
68: Re: Doubt concerning releasing code anonymously (John Cowan)
69: Re: Doubt concerning releasing code anonymously (Chris Travers)
70: Re: Doubt concerning releasing code anonymously (Andr Barbosa)
71: Re: Doubt concerning releasing code anonymously (John Cowan)
72: Re: Doubt concerning releasing code anonymously (David Woolley)
73: Re: Doubt concerning releasing code anonymously (David Woolley)
74: Re: Doubt concerning releasing code anonymously (Mahesh T. Pai)
75: Re: Doubt concerning releasing code anonymously (Johannes Buchner)
76: Re: Doubt concerning releasing code anonymously (John Cowan)
77: Re: Doubt concerning releasing code anonymously (Chris Travers)
78: Re: Licensing question (Mark James)
79: Re: Licensing question (Chris Travers)
80: Open Source Decision Models (Somik Raha)
81: Re: Open Source Decision Models (Kevin Hunter)
82: Re: Open Source Decision Models (Chuck Swiger)
83: Re: Open Source Decision Models (Somik Raha)
84: Re: Open Source Decision Models (Chris Travers)
85: Re: Open Source Decision Models (Lawrence Rosen)
86: Re: Open Source Decision Models (verdy_p)
87: Re: Open Source Decision Models (Chris Travers)
88: Re: Open Source Decision Models (verdy_p)
89: Re: Licensing question (Mark James)
90: Re: Licensing question (Mahesh T. Pai)
91: Re: Licensing question (Raj Mathur)
92: Re: Licensing question (Mark James)
93: Re: Licensing question (Mark James)
94: Re: Licensing question (Mahesh T. Pai)
95: Re: Licensing question (Mark James)
96: Re: Licensing question (Mahesh T. Pai)
97: Re: Licensing question (Chris Travers)
98: Appropriate licenses for web libraries (Pimm Hogeling)
99: Re: Appropriate licenses for web libraries (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)