Messages 166xx


00: Re: Appropriate licenses for web libraries (Pimm Hogeling)
01: Re: Appropriate licenses for web libraries (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
02: Re: Licensing question (Mark James)
03: Re: Licensing question (Chris Travers)
04: Re: Appropriate licenses for web libraries (David Woolley)
05: Re: Appropriate licenses for web libraries (Pimm Hogeling)
06: Re: Appropriate licenses for web libraries (Matthew Flaschen)
07: updating the MPL (Luis Villa)
08: Re: Appropriate licenses for web libraries (Pimm Hogeling)
09: Re: Licensing question (Mark James)
10: Re: Licensing question (Chris Travers)
11: Re: Licensing question (jonathon)
12: Re: Licensing question (Mahesh T. Pai)
13: Re: Licensing question (Mark James)
14: Re: Licensing question (Mahesh T. Pai)
15: Re: Licensing question (Clayton Dukes)
16: Re: Licensing question (Kevin Hunter)
17: Re: Licensing question (Chris Travers)
18: Attention ! Votre compte Paypal a été limité ! (Service.paypa.fr)
19: What does "new" mean in Section 1.9 (b) of the MPL v 1.1.? (Maria Magliano)
20: Re: What does "new" mean in Section 1.9 (b) of the MPL v 1.1.? (Smith, McCoy)
21: Re: What does "new" mean in Section 1.9 (b) of the MPL v 1.1.? (David Woolley)
22: Re: What does "new" mean in Section 1.9 (b) of the MPL v 1.1.? (Luis Villa)
23: Re: What does "new" mean in Section 1.9 (b) of the MPL v 1.1.? (Maria Magliano)
24: Re: What does "new" mean in Section 1.9 (b) of the MPL v 1.1.? (Mitchell Baker)
25: Re: What does "new" mean in Section 1.9 (b) of the MPL v 1.1.? (Maria Magliano)
26: Re: What does "new" mean in Section 1.9 (b) of the MPL v 1.1.? (Mitchell Baker)
27: Re: What does "new" mean in Section 1.9 (b) of the MPL v 1.1.? (Mitchell Baker)
28: PayPal Service - Confirmation De Vos Donneés Personnelle (service paypal)
29: PayPal Service - Confirmation De Vos Donneés Personnelle (service paypal)
30: OSI and ISO (Kai-Uwe Behrmann)
31: Re: OSI and ISO (Cinly Ooi)
32: Re: OSI and ISO (Chris DiBona)
33: Re: OSI and ISO (Chris Travers)
34: Re: OSI and ISO (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
35: AGPLv1 vs. AGPLv3 (opensource.*.nwo.neverbox.com)
36: Why isn't MIT license considered copyleft? (opensource.*.nwo.neverbox.com)
37: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (opensource.*.nwo.neverbox.com)
38: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (Romain Berrendonner)
39: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (opensource.*.nwo.neverbox.com)
40: Re: Why isn't MIT license considered copyleft? (Pimm Hogeling)
41: Re: Why isn't MIT license considered copyleft? (opensource.*.nwo.neverbox.com)
42: Re: AGPLv1 vs. AGPLv3 (Michael Poole)
43: Re: Why isn't MIT license considered copyleft? (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
44: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (John Cowan)
45: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (opensource.*.nwo.neverbox.com)
46: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (Chris Travers)
47: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (opensource.*.nwo.neverbox.com)
48: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (Luis Villa)
49: Questions regarding disclosure of open source (Joe Bell)
50: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (opensource.*.nwo.neverbox.com)
51: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (Ben Tilly)
52: Re: Questions regarding disclosure of open source (Chuck Swiger)
53: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (Luis Villa)
54: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
55: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
56: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (opensource.*.nwo.neverbox.com)
57: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (Johannes Buchner)
58: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
59: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (John Cowan)
60: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (John Cowan)
61: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (Chris Travers)
62: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (Chris Travers)
63: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (Chris Travers)
64: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (John Cowan)
65: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (Chris Travers)
66: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
67: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (Wilson, Andrew)
68: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (Chris Travers)
69: Re: GPLv3's secretive Additional Terms (Wilson, Andrew)
70: creative commons image collage (Vlad Stanimir)
71: Re: creative commons image collage (Johannes Buchner)
72: Re: creative commons image collage (Vlad Stanimir)
73: Re: creative commons image collage (David Woolley)
74: Votre demande de virement bancaire de 420,00 EUR (Service Bancaire)
75: Google WebM? (Justin Clift)
76: Re: Google WebM? (Chuck Swiger)
77: Re: Google WebM? (Richard Fontana)
78: Re: Google WebM? (Chuck Swiger)
79: Google's patent license for VP8 [was: Google WebM?] (Lawrence Rosen)
80: Re: Google's patent license for VP8 [was: Google WebM?] (Chris Travers)
81: Re: Google's patent license for VP8 [was: Google WebM?] (Chris DiBona)
82: Re: Google's patent license for VP8 [was: Google WebM?] (Ben Tilly)
83: Re: Google's patent license for VP8 [was: Google WebM?] (John Cowan)
84: Re: Google's patent license for VP8 [was: Google WebM?] (Chris Travers)
85: Re: Google's patent license for VP8 [was: Google WebM?] (Ben Tilly)
86: Re: Google's patent license for VP8 [was: Google WebM?] (Matthew Flaschen)
87: Google's patent license for VP8 [was: Google WebM?] (Chris Travers)
88: Re: Google's patent license for VP8 [was: Google WebM?] (Matthew Flaschen)
89: Re: Google's patent license for VP8 [was: Google WebM?] (Matthew Flaschen)
90: Re: Google's patent license for VP8 [was: Google WebM?] (David Shofi)
91: Re: Google's patent license for VP8 [was: Google WebM?] (Matthew Flaschen)
92: Developer won't release source licensed under modified BSD. (Electronjockey)
93: Re: Developer won't release source licensed under modified BSD. (Chris DiBona)
94: Re: Developer won't release source licensed under modified BSD. (Remco)
95: Re: Google's patent license for VP8 [was: Google WebM?] (Wilson, Andrew)
96: Re: Google's patent license for VP8 [was: Google WebM?] (Richard Fontana)
97: Re: Google's patent license for VP8 [was: Google WebM?] (Michael Tiemann)
98: Re: Google's patent license for VP8 [was: Google WebM?] (Wilson, Andrew)
99: Re: WebM license third-party submission (Chris DiBona)