Messages 167xx


00: Interesting Licensing for CERT BFF (David Dillard)
01: Re: Interesting Licensing for CERT BFF (David Woolley)
02: WebM license resolution. (Chris DiBona)
03: Re: [FTF-Legal] Fwd: WebM license resolution. (Lawrence Rosen)
04: Re: WebM license resolution. (mdtiemann.gmail.com)
05: Re: WebM license resolution. (Chris DiBona)
06: The Legal Tower of Babel, was Re: WebM license resolution. (Chris Travers)
07: Re: The Legal Tower of Babel, was Re: WebM license resolution. (Chris Travers)
08: Re: The Legal Tower of Babel, was Re: WebM license resolution. (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
09: Re: The Legal Tower of Babel, was Re: WebM license resolution. (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
10: Re: The Legal Tower of Babel, was Re: WebM license resolution. (Jeremy C. Reed)
11: BSD variants (was: RE: The Legal Tower of Babel, was Re: WebM license resolution.) (Wilson, Andrew)
12: Re: WebM license resolution. (Wilson, Andrew)
13: Re: BSD variants (was: RE: The Legal Tower of Babel, was Re: WebM license resolution.) (Jeremy C. Reed)
14: Re: WebM license resolution. (Chris DiBona)
15: Strange clauses in the Twidroid license (Martin Vilcans)
16: Re: Strange clauses in the Twidroid license (Kevin T. Neely)
17: Re: WebM license resolution. (Wilson, Andrew)
18: Re: WebM license resolution. (Chris DiBona)
19: Re: Strange clauses in the Twidroid license (Joe Bell)
20: Re: Strange clauses in the Twidroid license (Martin Vilcans)
21: Re: Strange clauses in the Twidroid license (Joe Bell)
22: protecting an Innovation from unlicensed abuse by a rival commercial 3rd party (Harri Saarikoski)
23: Re: protecting an Innovation from unlicensed abuse by a rival commercial 3rd party (Chuck Swiger)
24: Re: protecting an Innovation from unlicensed abuse by a rival commercial 3rd party (Mark James)
25: Re: protecting an Innovation from unlicensed abuse by a rival commercial 3rd party (Cinly Ooi)
26: Re: protecting an Innovation from unlicensed abuse by a rival commercial 3rd party (Marc Whipple)
27: Re: protecting an Innovation from unlicensed abuse by a rival commercial 3rd party (Harri Saarikoski)
28: Re: protecting an Innovation from unlicensed abuse by a rival commercial 3rd party (Harri Saarikoski)
29: Re: protecting an Innovation from unlicensed abuse by a rival commercial 3rd party (Cinly Ooi)
30: Re: protecting an Innovation from unlicensed abuse by a rival commercial 3rd party (Ben Tilly)
31: License compatibility problem (François Amato)
32: Re: License compatibility problem (Joe Bell)
33: question about a project licensed under CC NC claiming to be open source (Thomas Riboulet)
34: Re: question about a project licensed under CC NC claiming to be open source (John Cowan)
35: Re: question about a project licensed under CC NC claiming to be open source (Joseph Bell)
36: Re: question about a project licensed under CC NC claiming to be open source (Thomas Riboulet)
37: Re: question about a project licensed under CC NC claiming to be open source (Thomas Riboulet)
38: Re: question about a project licensed under CC NC claiming to be open source (Mark James)
39: Re: question about a project licensed under CC NC claiming to be open source (Tzeng, Nigel H.)
40: Re: question about a project licensed under CC NC claiming to be open source (Joseph Bell)
41: Re: question about a project licensed under CC NC claiming to be open source (David Woolley)
42: Re: question about a project licensed under CC NC claiming to be open source (Tzeng, Nigel H.)
43: Re: question about a project licensed under CC NC claiming to be open source (John Cowan)
44: Re: question about a project licensed under CC NC claiming to be open source (Thomas Riboulet)
45: Re: question about a project licensed under CC NC claiming to be open source (jonathon)
46: Open Data Definition at OSCON (Russ Nelson)
47: Re: Open Data Definition at OSCON (Luis Villa)
48: Re: Open Data Definition at OSCON (Luis Villa)
49: Re: Open Data Definition at OSCON (Russ Nelson)
50: Re: Open Data Definition at OSCON (Luis Villa)
51: what defines source code in (A)GPL ? (Harri Saarikoski)
52: Re: what defines source code in (A)GPL ? (Chuck Swiger)
53: Re: what defines source code in (A)GPL ? (Harri Saarikoski)
54: Re: what defines source code in (A)GPL ? (Chuck Swiger)
55: Re: ICC profiles and open licensing (Kai-Uwe Behrmann)
56: Re: ICC profiles and open licensing (Chuck Swiger)
57: Re: what defines source code in (A)GPL ? (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
58: Re: what defines source code in (A)GPL ? (Harri Saarikoski)
59: Re: what defines source code in (A)GPL ? (Wilson, Andrew)
60: Re: what defines source code in (A)GPL ? (Harri Saarikoski)
61: Re: what defines source code in (A)GPL ? (Ben Tilly)
62: Re: what defines source code in (A)GPL ? (Harri Saarikoski)
63: Re: what defines source code in (A)GPL ? (Wilson, Andrew)
64: Re: what defines source code in (A)GPL ? (John Cowan)
65: Re: what defines source code in (A)GPL ? (David Woolley)
66: Re: what defines source code in (A)GPL ? (John Cowan)
67: Trademark policies and licenses (Tony Yarusso)
68: Deriving new works from an application using Eclipse Public License v1.0 (Chris Melikian)
69: Re: Deriving new works from an application using Eclipse Public License v1.0 (David Woolley)
70: Physical file organisation of any bearing to LGPL? (Stuart Rossiter)
71: Re: Physical file organisation of any bearing to LGPL? (Tony Yarusso)
72: Re: Physical file organisation of any bearing to LGPL? (David Woolley)
73: Re: Physical file organisation of any bearing to LGPL? (Wilson, Andrew)
74: Re: Physical file organisation of any bearing to LGPL? (Mark Wielaard)
75: Re: Physical file organisation of any bearing to LGPL? (Wilson, Andrew)
76: Re: Physical file organisation of any bearing to LGPL? (Mark Wielaard)
77: Re: Physical file organisation of any bearing to LGPL? (Wilson, Andrew)
78: Re: Physical file organisation of any bearing to LGPL? (Mark Wielaard)
79: Re: Trademark policies and licenses (Russ Nelson)
80: Is INI file structure covered? (LWC)
81: This license is effective until X (LWC)
82: Re: This license is effective until X (David Woolley)
83: Re: Is INI file structure covered? (David Woolley)
84: Legal Release of Closed Source under Open Source License (Andrew Cutler)
85: Re: Legal Release of Closed Source under Open Source License (DShofi.atmi.com)
86: Re: Legal Release of Closed Source under Open Source License (Cinly Ooi)
87: Re: Legal Release of Closed Source under Open Source License (Andrew Cutler)
88: Re: Legal Release of Closed Source under Open Source License (Andrew Cutler)
89: Re: Legal Release of Closed Source under Open Source License (DShofi.atmi.com)
90: Re: Legal Release of Closed Source under Open Source License (Andrew Cutler)
91: Re: Legal Release of Closed Source under Open Source License (David Woolley)
92: Re: Legal Release of Closed Source under Open Source License (David Woolley)
93: Changes in license terms (Michael Bradley)
94: Re: Changes in license terms (Chuck Swiger)
95: Re: Changes in license terms (Mahesh T. Pai)
96: Re: Changes in license terms (John Cowan)
97: Including a ZLib third-party source code in a Modified BSD Licensed Project (Antonio Ragagnin)
98: Re: Including a ZLib third-party source code in a Modified BSD Licensed Project (David Woolley)
99: Re: Including a ZLib third-party source code in a Modified BSD Licensed Project (John Cowan)