Messages 172xx


00: Important for my dissertation: F/LOSS Motivation for programmers (onur meci)
01: Re: IP Clearance (Lawrence Rosen)
02: Re: IP Clearance (John Cowan)
03: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Thomas Schneider)
04: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Chuck Swiger)
05: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (John Cowan)
06: Re: IP Clearance (Lawrence Rosen)
07: Re: IP Clearance (Chris Travers)
08: Re: IP Clearance (John Cowan)
09: Re: IP Clearance (John Cowan)
10: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Thomas Schneider)
11: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Chuck Swiger)
12: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Thomas Schneider)
13: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Chuck Swiger)
14: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (TW)
15: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (John Cowan)
16: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Thomas Schneider)
17: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Thomas Schneider)
18: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Mahesh T. Pai)
19: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (TW)
20: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Thomas Schneider)
21: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Thomas Schneider)
22: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Thomas Schneider)
23: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (David Woolley)
24: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Thomas Schneider)
25: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Rick Moen)
26: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Tzeng, Nigel H.)
27: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Greg Grossmeier)
28: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Tzeng, Nigel H.)
29: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Greg Grossmeier)
30: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Thomas Schneider)
31: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Thomas Schneider)
32: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Rick Moen)
33: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (David Woolley)
34: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (John Cowan)
35: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Thomas Schneider)
36: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Thomas Schneider)
37: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Thomas Schneider)
38: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Thomas Schneider)
39: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (jonathon)
40: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Rod Dixon)
41: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Karl Fogel)
42: commercial distribution (Mike Cu)
43: Re: commercial distribution (Buddhika Chandradeepa Kurera)
44: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Tzeng, Nigel H.)
45: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Ben Tilly)
46: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Nick Moffitt)
47: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Russell McOrmond)
48: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Tzeng, Nigel H.)
49: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Karl Fogel)
50: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Lawrence Rosen)
51: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Karl Fogel)
52: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Tzeng, Nigel H.)
53: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Chris Travers)
54: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Ben Tilly)
55: Re: commercial distribution (David Woolley)
56: Re: commercial distribution (David Woolley)
57: Re: commercial distribution (Ben Tilly)
58: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Mike Linksvayer)
59: Re: commercial distribution (Karl Fogel)
60: Re: commercial distribution (Ben Tilly)
61: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Thomas Schneider)
62: Re: commercial distribution (Karl Fogel)
63: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Russell McOrmond)
64: Re: commercial distribution (Mike Cu)
65: Re: commercial distribution (Ippersiel, Luc André)
66: OSI license@ lists upgrade this Friday (addresses not changing). (Karl Fogel)
67: Re: commercial distribution (Karl Fogel)
68: Re: commercial distribution (Mike Cu)
69: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Thomas Schneider)
70: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Rick Moen)
71: MPL RC1 posted to license-review (Luis Villa)
72: Re: MPL RC1 posted to license-review (Alexandre Terekhov)
73: Re: MPL RC1 posted to license-review (Karl Fogel)
74: Re: MPL RC1 posted to license-review (Alexandre Terekhov)
75: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Alexandre Terekhov)
76: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Alexandre Terekhov)
77: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Chad Perrin)
78: Terekhov [was Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose.] (Luis Villa)
79: Re: Terekhov [was Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose.] (Karl Fogel)
80: Re: Terekhov (Alexandre Terekhov)
81: Re: Terekhov (Karl Fogel)
82: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (dennis byron)
83: Re: Which DUAL Licence should I choose. (Thomas Schneider)
84: no www.opensource.org from AOL DNS (Kai-Uwe Behrmann)
85: Re: no www.opensource.org from AOL DNS (Chuck Swiger)
86: Re: no www.opensource.org from AOL DNS (Karl Fogel)
87: Offering secondary nameservice (was: no www.opensource.org from AOL DNS) (Rick Moen)
88: Re: Offering secondary nameservice (Karl Fogel)
89: Re: Offering secondary nameservice (Rick Moen)
90: Re: FOR APPROVAL - Python License Changes (Karl Fogel)
91: Re: The Python licensing situation. (Karl Fogel)
92: Re: FOR APPROVAL - Python License Changes (Russ Nelson)
93: Re: FOR APPROVAL - Python License Changes (Rod Dixon)
94: Re: FOR APPROVAL - Python License Changes (Karl Fogel)
95: EPICS Open License (U.S. gov't DOE / ANL project). (Karl Fogel)
96: Re: EPICS Open License (U.S. gov't DOE / ANL project). (John Cowan)
97: Re: EPICS Open License (U.S. gov't DOE / ANL project). (Karl Fogel)
98: Can OSI specify that public domain is open source? (Karl Fogel)
99: Re: Can OSI specify that public domain is open source? (John Cowan)