Messages 33xx


00: Re: copyrightable APIs? (was RE: namespace protection compatiblewit (Brian Behlendorf)
01: Re: Is this better for tomsrtbt? (Tom Oehser)
02: Re: Is this better for tomsrtbt? (Dave J Woolley)
03: Re: Is this better for tomsrtbt? (Tom Oehser)
04: Re: Is this better for tomsrtbt? (Karsten M. Self)
05: Re: Is this better for tomsrtbt? (Tom Oehser)
06: Now I'll do it myself: OWL R1 (mirabilos)
07: Re: Now I'll do it myself: OWL R1 (Karsten M. Self)
08: Re: Now I'll do it myself: OWL R1 (mirabilos)
09: Test (David Johnson)
10: Re: Test (Randy Kramer)
11: Re: Test (Karsten M. Self)
12: Re: Test (David Johnson)
13: Re: Test (Randy Kramer)
14: Re: Test (Toon Knapen)
15: Re: Test (Brian Behlendorf)
16: Re: Test (Ian Lance Taylor)
17: Newbie questions... (Ben Sawyer)
18: Re: Newbie questions... (John Cowan)
19: Re: Newbie questions... (Karsten M. Self)
20: OWL short explanation (mirabilos)
21: Re: Newbie questions... (Ravicher, Daniel B.)
22: IBM Public License and Debian Linux..... Not compatible? (Carter Bullard)
23: Re: IBM Public License and Debian Linux..... Not compatible? (Ian Lance Taylor)
24: Re: IBM Public License and Debian Linux..... Not compatible? (Carter Bullard)
25: Re: IBM Public License and Debian Linux..... Not compatible? (Ian Lance Taylor)
26: Re: IBM Public License and Debian Linux..... Not compatible? (David Johnson)
27: Re: IBM Public License and Debian Linux..... Not compatible? (Karsten M. Self)
28: Common Public License (Greg Lyons)
29: idle-priority: OWL R1 (mirabilos)
30: Re: idle-priority: OWL R1 (Karsten M. Self)
31: Re: idle-priority: OWL R1 (mirabilos)
32: Re: idle-priority: OWL R1 (Karsten M. Self)
33: Re: idle-priority: OWL R1) (phil hunt)
34: Re: idle-priority: OWL R1) (Karsten M. Self)
35: Re: idle-priority: OWL R1 (Rick Moen)
36: Re: idle-priority: OWL R1 (mirabilos)
37: Urgent (Ahmed & Associates)
38: Re: Urgent (Charlie Stross)
39: Re: Urgent (Karsten M. Self)
40: spam on license-discuss (Russell Nelson)
41: Re: spam on license-discuss (Karsten M. Self)
42: Newly approved licenses (Lawrence E. Rosen)
43: Re: IBM Public License and Debian Linux..... Not compatible? (Dan Streetman)
44: Re: IBM Public License (Lawrence E. Rosen)
45: Common Public License/Agreement Steward (David Croft)
46: No rights reserved (David Croft)
47: Re: No rights reserved (David Johnson)
48: Re: No rights reserved (David Croft)
49: Re: No rights reserved (John Cowan)
50: Re: No rights reserved (John Cowan)
51: All rights waived (David Croft)
52: Re: IBM Public License (Karsten M. Self)
53: Re: All rights waived (David Johnson)
54: Re: All rights waived (John Cowan)
55: Suggestion for OSI website (was: Newly approved licenses) (phil hunt)
56: Common Public License (Michael Cochran)
57: Re: Common Public License (Ravicher, Daniel B.)
58: Re: Common Public License (John Cowan)
59: Re: Common Public License (SamBC)
60: Re: Common Public License (Ravicher, Daniel B.)
61: Re: Common Public License (John Cowan)
62: The Straight Dope on Zope (Feller, Joe)
63: Re: Common Public License (phil hunt)
64: Re: Common Public License (John Cowan)
65: Re: The Straight Dope on Zope (Derek Seabury)
66: Re: License List -- as of 9-11-00 (Philippe Le Hegaret)
67: Re: License List -- as of 9-11-00 (John Cowan)
68: Re: License List -- as of 9-11-00 (Matthew C. Weigel)
69: Re: License List -- as of 9-11-00 (Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.)
70: Re: License List -- as of 9-11-00 (Matthew C. Weigel)
71: Invitation for Comment (Ravicher, Daniel B.)
72: Open Source - Resources doubt (Clebert Suconic)
73: Re: Open Source - Resources doubt (Matthew C. Weigel)
74: license submission: qmail (Brian Behlendorf)
75: Re: license submission: qmail (John Cowan)
76: Re: license submission: qmail (Ian Lance Taylor)
77: Re: license submission: qmail (Ian Lance Taylor)
78: Re: license submission: qmail (Matthew C. Weigel)
79: Re: license submission: qmail (John Cowan)
80: Re: license submission: qmail (Brian Behlendorf)
81: Re: license submission: qmail (Matthew C. Weigel)
82: Re: license submission: qmail (Brian Behlendorf)
83: Re: license submission: qmail (Matthew C. Weigel)
84: Re: license submission: qmail (Brian Behlendorf)
85: Re: license submission: qmail (Ian Lance Taylor)
86: Re: license submission: qmail (John Cowan)
87: Re: license submission: qmail (John Cowan)
88: Re: license submission: qmail (Matthew C. Weigel)
89: MSFT and GNU questions (Karsten M. Self)
90: Re: license submission: qmail (Brian Behlendorf)
91: Re: license submission: qmail (Brian Behlendorf)
92: Re: license submission: qmail (Brian Behlendorf)
93: Re: license submission: qmail (John Cowan)
94: Re: license submission: qmail (David Johnson)
95: Re: MSFT and GNU questions (David Johnson)
96: Re: license submission: qmail (Rick Moen)
97: Re: MSFT and GNU questions (Laura Majerus)
98: Re: MSFT and GNU questions (Karsten M. Self)
99: interpreted languages and the LGPL (Earl H. Merry)