Messages 42xx


00: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (Chloe Hoffman)
01: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (Rod Dixon)
02: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (Angelo Schneider)
03: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (Chris Gray)
04: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (Lawrence E. Rosen)
05: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (Randy Kramer)
06: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (email.greglondon.com)
07: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (Michael Beck)
08: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (David Johnson)
09: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (David Johnson)
10: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (David Johnson)
11: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.)
12: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (Karsten M. Self)
13: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (Michael Beck)
14: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (Michael Beck)
15: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (Michael Beck)
16: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (Michael Beck)
17: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (Michael Beck)
18: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (email.greglondon.com)
19: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (email.greglondon.com)
20: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (Michael Beck)
21: Michael Beck (Karsten M. Self)
22: Re: what was the point? (John Cowan)
23: Re: what was the point? (Karsten M. Self)
24: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (Michael Beck)
25: Re: Linking and the GPL (John Cowan)
26: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (Michael Beck)
27: Re: Is inherited class a derivative work? (Michael Beck)
28: MrNet has a non compliant opensource license (Rui Miguel Seabra)
29: Re: MrNet has a non compliant opensource license (David Johnson)
30: Re: MrNet has a non compliant opensource license (Karsten M. Self)
31: Re: MrNet has a non compliant opensource license (phil hunt)
32: Re: MrNet has a non compliant opensource license (Karsten M. Self)
33: Re: MrNet has a non compliant opensource license (Karsten M. Self)
34: Re: MrNet has a non compliant opensource license (Rui Miguel Seabra)
35: Re: MrNet has a non compliant opensource license (Álvaro Amorim Pinto)
36: Re: MrNet has a non compliant opensource license (Karsten M. Self)
37: Article on open-source licenses (and the OSI) (Steve Lhomme)
38: Re: Article on open-source licenses (and the OSI) (Karsten M. Self)
39: Re: Article on open-source licenses (and the OSI) (Steve Mallett)
40: Re: Article on open-source licenses (and the OSI) (email.greglondon.com)
41: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (Russell Nelson)
42: Re: Article on open-source licenses (and the OSI) (Sean Doherty)
43: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (DIETRICH Yann FTRD/VAT/ISS)
44: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (Ken Arromdee)
45: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (John Cowan)
46: Re: Article on open-source licenses (and the OSI) (Ken Brown)
47: Re: Article on open-source licenses (and the OSI) (Russell Nelson)
48: Re: Article on open-source licenses (and the OSI) (Karsten M. Self)
49: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (Russell Nelson)
50: Re: Article on open-source licenses (and the OSI) (Steve Mallett)
51: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (M. Drew Streib)
52: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (Karsten M. Self)
53: Can anyone say his or her software is open source? (Tina Gasperson)
54: Can anyone say his or her software is open source? (Tina Gasperson)
55: Re: Can anyone say his or her software is open source? (Karsten M. Self)
56: Re: Article on open-source licenses (and the OSI) (email.greglondon.com)
57: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (email.greglondon.com)
58: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (David Johnson)
59: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (David Johnson)
60: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (M. Drew Streib)
61: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (Laura Majerus)
62: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (David Johnson)
63: Re: Can anyone say his or her software is open source? (David Johnson)
64: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (John Cowan)
65: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (Russell Nelson)
66: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (Russell Nelson)
67: Re: Can anyone say his or her software is open source? (Matthew C. Weigel)
68: Re: Can anyone say his or her software is open source? (Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.)
69: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (David Johnson)
70: Re: Can anyone say his or her software is open source? (David Johnson)
71: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (Russell Nelson)
72: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (Forrest J. Cavalier III)
73: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (David Johnson)
74: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (Russell Nelson)
75: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (David Johnson)
76: Re: Can anyone say his or her software is open source? (Martin Konold)
77: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License] (Abe Kornelis)
78: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (Karsten M. Self)
79: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (DIETRICH Yann FTRD/VAT/ISS)
80: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (Russell Nelson)
81: Re: Can anyone say his or her software is open source? (Tina Gasperson)
82: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (email.greglondon.com)
83: Re: Can anyone say his or her software is open source? (Lawrence E. Rosen)
84: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (Chloe Hoffman)
85: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (Chloe Hoffman)
86: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (Chloe Hoffman)
87: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (David Johnson)
88: Response to comments on Intel's proposed BSD+Patent license (Stamnes, Michelle)
89: Re: Response to comments on Intel's proposed BSD+Patent license (Matthew C. Weigel)
90: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (Abe Kornelis)
91: Re: Response to comments on Intel's proposed BSD+Patent license (Forrest J. Cavalier III)
92: [Approval Request] Kallisys Reflexive License (Paul Guyot)
93: Re: Can anyone say his or her software is open source? (Tina Gasperson)
94: Re: [Approval Request] Kallisys Reflexive License (Abe Kornelis)
95: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (Stamnes, Michelle)
96: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (John Cowan)
97: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (Russell Nelson)
98: Re: Response to comments on Intel's proposed BSD+Patent license (Randy Kramer)
99: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License (John Cowan)