Messages 55xx


00: Re: discuss: Bento Poetic License (resubmission) (Michael St . Hippolyte)
01: Re: discuss: Open Game Source License (Randy Kramer)
02: Re: discuss: Open Game Source License (John Cowan)
03: Re: discuss: Open Game Source License (Tig)
04: Re: discuss: Open Game Source License (Tig)
05: Re: discuss: Bento Poetic License (resubmission) (Brian Behlendorf)
06: Re: discuss: Bento Poetic License (resubmission) (John Cowan)
07: simple copyleft with attempt at GPL-compatible provisions (Bruce Dodson)
08: Re: discuss: Bento Poetic License (resubmission) (Michael St . Hippolyte)
09: Re: simple copyleft with attempt at GPL-compatible provisions (Forrest J. Cavalier III)
10: Re: discuss: Bento Poetic License (resubmission) (Michael St . Hippolyte)
11: Re: simple copyleft with attempt at GPL-compatible provisions (Bruce Dodson)
12: simple copyleft with GPL compatibility via a disjunctive-license clause (Bruce Dodson)
13: Re: discuss: Bento Poetic License (resubmission) (Brian Behlendorf)
14: Re: discuss: Bento Poetic License (resubmission) (Michael St . Hippolyte)
15: license template for simple copyleft - seeking comments one last time (Bruce Dodson)
16: Re: discuss: Bento Poetic License (resubmission) (Thatcher Ulrich)
17: Re: discuss: Bento Poetic License (resubmission) (Michael St . Hippolyte)
18: thanks for helpful suggestions - (simple copyleft license template) (Bruce Dodson)
19: discuss: WGPL (WebGPL) (INTERNET ARMY Site Hosting Administrator)
20: Re: discuss: WGPL (WebGPL) (Ken Arromdee)
21: Re: discuss: WGPL (WebGPL) (Bruce Dodson)
22: Open Software License version 1.0 (Lawrence E. Rosen)
23: Re: Open Software License version 1.0 (Andy Tai)
24: ESST license (Parson, Dale E \(Dale\))
25: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template (Russell Nelson)
26: Re: ESST license (Florian Weimer)
27: Re: ESST license (Parson, Dale E (Dale))
28: Re: ESST license (Parson, Dale E (Dale))
29: Re: ESST license (Bruce Dodson)
30: Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template (Bruce Dodson)
31: question about the term "source" (Svend Tofte)
32: Re: question about the term "source" (Lawrence E. Rosen)
33: Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template (Bruce Dodson)
34: Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template (Lawrence E. Rosen)
35: Open Software License (Lawrence E. Rosen)
36: Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template (Russell Nelson)
37: RPSL pre-discussion (Rob Lanphier)
38: Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template (Bruce Dodson)
39: Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template (Russell Nelson)
40: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Russell Nelson)
41: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Rod Dixon)
42: Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template (John Cowan)
43: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Ian Lance Taylor)
44: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (David Johnson)
45: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Rod Dixon)
46: Re: discuss: SHPTRANS License Template (Bruce Dodson)
47: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Michael St . Hippolyte)
48: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Russell Nelson)
49: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Carol A. Kunze)
50: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 (Lawrence E. Rosen)
51: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Brian Behlendorf)
52: Re: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 (John Cowan)
53: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (M. Drew Streib)
54: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Lawrence E. Rosen)
55: Re: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 (Lawrence E. Rosen)
56: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Mahesh T Pai)
57: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Mahesh T Pai)
58: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (M. Drew Streib)
59: Re: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 (Ken Arromdee)
60: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Lawrence E. Rosen)
61: Re: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 (Lawrence E. Rosen)
62: Re: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 (John Cowan)
63: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Nick Moffitt)
64: Re: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 (Ken Arromdee)
65: Re: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 (Lawrence E. Rosen)
66: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Tina Gasperson)
67: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (David Johnson)
68: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (David Johnson)
69: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Russell Nelson)
70: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Russell Nelson)
71: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Russell Nelson)
72: Re: OSL Version 1.0 dated 8/2/2002 (Ken Arromdee)
73: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Brian Behlendorf)
74: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Russell Nelson)
75: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Rod Dixon)
76: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Michael St . Hippolyte)
77: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (John Cowan)
78: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Lawrence E. Rosen)
79: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Bruce Perens)
80: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (David Johnson)
81: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Lawrence E. Rosen)
82: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (David Johnson)
83: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution ('Bruce Perens')
84: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Rod Dixon)
85: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (David Johnson)
86: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Bruce Perens)
87: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Rod Dixon)
88: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Bruce Perens)
89: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Russell Nelson)
90: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Russell Nelson)
91: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Russell Nelson)
92: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Forrest J Cavalier III)
93: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Mahesh T Pai)
94: Re: Open Software License (Mahesh T Pai)
95: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (Mahesh T Pai)
96: A practical example of a click-wrap license (Lawrence E. Rosen)
97: Re: A practical example of a click-wrap license (Eric S Raymond)
98: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution (David Johnson)
99: Re: A practical example of a click-wrap license (Lawrence E. Rosen)