Messages 6xx


00: Re: Redistribution vs user (bruce.perens.com)
01: Re: Redistribution vs user (Mark Wells)
02: Simple Public License, second draft (Justin Wells)
03: Re: Simple Public License, second draft (Philipp Gühring)
04: advertising clauses (Brian Behlendorf)
05: Re: advertising clauses (David Starner)
06: Re: advertising clauses (Ian Lance Taylor)
07: Re: Simple Public License, second draft (Justin Wells)
08: Re: Simple Public License, second draft (bruce.perens.com)
09: Re: Simple Public License, second draft (Justin Wells)
10: Re: Simple Public License, second draft (bruce.perens.com)
11: Re: Simple Public License, second draft (Nick Moffitt)
12: Sun's StarOffice Release: Is It Really What You Think? (bruce.perens.com)
13: Re: Sun's StarOffice Release: Is It Really What You Think? (phred.teleport.com)
14: Request for Open Source License Approval (Brice, Richard)
15: Re: Request for Open Source License Approval (Seth David Schoen)
16: Re: Request for Open Source License Approval (Seth David Schoen)
17: Re: Request for Open Source License Approval (Brice, Richard)
18: Re: Request for Open Source License Approval (bruce.perens.com)
19: Re: Request for Open Source License Approval (Seth David Schoen)
20: ATT (bruce.perens.com)
21: Re: ATT (J.H.M. Dassen (Ray))
22: Re: ATT (bruce.perens.com)
23: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (bruce.perens.com)
24: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (Andrew J Bromage)
25: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (Forrest J. Cavalier III)
26: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (bruce.perens.com)
27: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (Mark Wells)
28: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (Andrew J Bromage)
29: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (David Starner)
30: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (John Cowan)
31: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (John Cowan)
32: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (Bruce Perens)
33: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (Bruce Perens)
34: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (Bruce Perens)
35: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (Forrest J. Cavalier III)
36: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (Bruce Perens)
37: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (Bruce Perens)
38: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (Andrew J Bromage)
39: Re: Oversimplifications in HtN (esr.thyrsus.com)
40: Re: Essay RFC delayed. (esr.thyrsus.com)
41: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (bruce.perens.com)
42: Re: Essay RFC delayed. (bruce.perens.com)
43: Implementing an encumbered API (was that AT&T licence thing) (Andrew J Bromage)
44: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (Forrest J. Cavalier III)
45: Re: Essay RFC delayed. (Forrest J. Cavalier III)
46: GPL unfavour (Ian Grigg)
47: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (John Cowan)
48: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (Ken Arromdee)
49: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (bruce.perens.com)
50: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (Justin Wells)
51: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (Ken Arromdee)
52: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (bruce.perens.com)
53: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (Ken Arromdee)
54: agreement to comply (bruce.perens.com)
55: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (mark.pc-intouch.com)
56: Re: agreement to comply (Ken Arromdee)
57: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (bruce.perens.com)
58: Re: agreement to comply (bruce.perens.com)
59: Scaring away suits with our mailing-list conduct (bruce.perens.com)
60: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (Mark Wells)
61: Re: Scaring away suits with our mailing-list conduct (Forrest J. Cavalier III)
62: Re: ATT SOURCE CODE AGREEMENT Version 1.2C (bruce.perens.com)
63: Re: Essay RFC delayed. (Richard Stallman)
64: Alternate Route Open Source Licenses (Brice, Richard)
65: Alternate Route Open Source Licenses (Brice, Richard)
66: distribution: how much is enough? (Signal 11)
67: LPF email address (Andrew J Bromage)
68: Re: Alternate Route Open Source Licenses (bruce.perens.com)
69: Re: LPF email address (bruce.perens.com)
70: Re: distribution: how much is enough? (Seth David Schoen)
71: Re: Oversimplifications in HtN -- Philosophy and biology (Eric S. Raymond)
72: Who gets stuck with advocacy? (Eric S. Raymond)
73: Re: Who gets stuck with advocacy? (Justin Wells)
74: Re: Who gets stuck with advocacy? (Eric S. Raymond)
75: Anarchy vs. "libertarian anarchist" (Angelo Schneider)
76: Can we split this off to another list, please (bruce.perens.com)
77: Re: The Essay is Done. (Eric S. Raymond)
78: Corel (bruce.perens.com)
79: Re: Oversimplifications in HtN -- Philosophy and biology (Richard Stallman)
80: Re: Oversimplifications in HtN -- Philosophy and biology (Eric S. Raymond)
81: Re: Oversimplifications in HtN -- Philosophy and biology (bruce.perens.com)
82: How about license-review@opensource.org? (johnston.vectaport.com)
83: Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? (Richard Auld)
84: Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? (phred.teleport.com)
85: Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? (Derek J. Balling)
86: Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? (Andrew J Bromage)
87: Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? (Derek J. Balling)
88: Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? (bruce.perens.com)
89: Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? (Justin Wells)
90: Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? (Andrew J Bromage)
91: Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? (bruce.perens.com)
92: Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? (Ali Assam)
93: Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? (Justin Wells)
94: Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? (mark.pc-intouch.com)
95: Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? (Signal 11)
96: Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? (bruce.perens.com)
97: Re: How about license-review@opensource.org? (Signal 11)
98: Corel: No "internal" exemption in GPL (Justin Wells)
99: Corel beta-test agreement (bruce.perens.com)