Messages 83xx


00: Re: Dual licensing -- other wrinkles (John Cowan)
01: Re: Dual licensing -- other wrinkles (Rick Moen)
02: Re: Dual licensing -- other wrinkles (No Spam)
03: Re: Dual licensing -- other wrinkles (Sam Barnett-Cormack)
04: Re: Dual licensing -- other wrinkles (No Spam)
05: Re: Dual licensing -- other wrinkles (John Cowan)
06: Re: Dual licensing -- other wrinkles (John Cowan)
07: the provide, license verbs (was: Dual licensing) (Marius Amado Alves)
08: Re: the provide, license verbs (was: Dual licensing) (Rick Moen)
09: Re: the provide, license verbs (was: Dual licensing) (Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.)
10: Re: the provide, license verbs (Marius Amado Alves)
11: Re: the provide, license verbs (was: Dual licensing) (jcowan.reutershealth.com)
12: Re: the provide, license verbs (Rick Moen)
13: Re: the provide, license verbs (Stephen C. North)
14: Re: the provide, license verbs (was: Dual licensing) (Rick Moen)
15: Re: the provide, license verbs (Rick Moen)
16: Re: the provide, license verbs (jcowan.reutershealth.com)
17: Re: the provide, license verbs (Rick Moen)
18: Re: the provide, license verbs (Stephen C. North)
19: Re: the provide, license verbs (Rick Moen)
20: Re: the provide, license verbs (was: Dual licensing) (Sam Barnett-Cormack)
21: Re: the provide, license verbs (Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.)
22: Re: the provide, license verbs (Rick Moen)
23: Re: the provide, license verbs (No Spam)
24: Re: the provide, license verbs (Rick Moen)
25: Re: the provide, license verbs (No Spam)
26: Re: the provide, license verbs (Rick Moen)
27: Re: the provide, license verbs (Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.)
28: Re: the provide, license verbs (Chris F Clark)
29: Re: the provide, license verbs (Chris F Clark)
30: Re: the provide, license verbs (Rick Moen)
31: Re: the provide, license verbs (jcowan.reutershealth.com)
32: Re: the provide, license verbs - numbers (Alvin Oga)
33: Re: the provide, license verbs (Rick Moen)
34: KDE violates IBM patent (dlw)
35: Re: KDE violates IBM patent (Robert Osfield)
36: Re: KDE violates IBM patent (Marius Amado Alves)
37: Re: KDE violates IBM patent (Alexander Terekhov)
38: Re: KDE violates IBM patent (Ruth A. Kramer)
39: Re: KDE violates IBM patent (Marius Amado Alves)
40: Re: KDE violates IBM patent (Arnoud Engelfriet)
41: Re: KDE violates IBM patent (Steven Noels)
42: Re: KDE violates IBM patent (Robin 'Roblimo' Miller)
43: Re: KDE violates IBM patent (Ruth A. Kramer)
44: Re: free Re: Dual licensing (Russell Nelson)
45: Re: Seeking input on license of existing project (Russell Nelson)
46: Re: Creative Commons Attribution (Russell Nelson)
47: Re: Dual licensing (Russell Nelson)
48: Re: Dual licensing (Russell Nelson)
49: Re: Dual licensing (Marius Amado Alves)
50: Re: Dual licensing (Marius Amado Alves)
51: Re: Dual licensing (Mahesh T. Pai)
52: Re: Dual licensing (Ian Lance Taylor)
53: Re: Dual licensing (Marius Amado Alves)
54: Re: Dual licensing (Ian Lance Taylor)
55: Re: Dual licensing (Stephen C. North)
56: Re: Dual licensing (Ian Lance Taylor)
57: Re: Dual licensing (Chris F Clark)
58: Re: Dual licensing (dlw)
59: Re: Dual licensing (Rick Moen)
60: Re: Dual licensing (Rick Moen)
61: Re: Dual licensing (nospam+pixelglow.com.pixelglow.com)
62: Re: Dual licensing (Sam Barnett-Cormack)
63: Re: Dual licensing (John Cowan)
64: Re: Dual licensing (John Cowan)
65: Re: Dual licensing (No Spam)
66: Re: Dual licensing (Rick Moen)
67: Sleepycat license (nospam+pixelglow.com.pixelglow.com)
68: OSD #6 (fields of endeavor) and research vs commercial rights (Bob Scheifler)
69: OSD #6 (fields of endeavor) and research vs commercial rights (Bob Scheifler)
70: Re: OSD #6 (fields of endeavor) and research vs commercial rights (Randall Burns)
71: Re: OSD #6 (fields of endeavor) and research vs commercial rights (Bob Scheifler)
72: Re: OSD #6 (fields of endeavor) and research vs commercial rights (Bob Scheifler)
73: Re: Dual licensing (nospam+pixelglow.com.pixelglow.com)
74: Re: Dual licensing (Russell Nelson)
75: Re: OSD #6 (fields of endeavor) and research vs commercial rights (Russell Nelson)
76: [Off-topic] open-source-debate (was Re: Dual licensing) (Evan Prodromou)
77: Re: Dual licensing (Rick Moen)
78: Re: OSD #6 (fields of endeavor) and research vs commercial rights (Bob Scheifler)
79: Re: OSD #6 (fields of endeavor) and research vs commercial rights (Russell Nelson)
80: Re: OSD #6 (fields of endeavor) and research vs commercial rights (Bob Scheifler)
81: Re: OSD #6 (fields of endeavor) and research vs commercial rights (Chris F Clark)
82: Re: Creative Commons Attribution (Russell McOrmond)
83: Re: Dual licensing (Russell McOrmond)
84: Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception? (No Spam)
85: Re: Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception? (Rick Moen)
86: Re: Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception? (nospam+pixelglow.com.pixelglow.com)
87: Re: Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception? (John Cowan)
88: Re: Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception? (Rick Moen)
89: Re: Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception? (No Spam)
90: Re: Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception? (John Cowan)
91: Re: Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception? (Lawrence Rosen)
92: Re: Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception? (Martin Konold)
93: Re: Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception? (Rick Moen)
94: Re: Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception? (Zak Greant)
95: Re: Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception? (Zak Greant)
96: Re: Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception? (Rick Moen)
97: Re: Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception? (Rick Moen)
98: Re: Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception? (Zak Greant)
99: Re: Effect of the MySQL FLOSS License Exception? (Alex Rousskov)