Messages 93xx


00: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Bob Scheifler)
01: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Ian Jackson)
02: For Approval CA-TOSL 1.1 (Sam Greenblatt)
03: For Approval CA-TOSL 1.1 (Sam Greenblatt)
04: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Lawrence Rosen)
05: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Bob Scheifler)
06: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Lawrence Rosen)
07: request feedback on a new licence profile (Darren Duncan)
08: Re: request feedback on a new licence profile (Ian Lance Taylor)
09: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (todd glassey)
10: Re: request feedback on a new licence profile (Ernest Prabhakar)
11: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Bob Scheifler)
12: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Bob Scheifler)
13: Re: request feedback on a new licence profile (Chuck Swiger)
14: Re: request feedback on a new licence profile (Stéphane Croisier)
15: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (todd.glassey.att.net)
16: Re: License Committee Report for December 2004 (Thorsten Glaser)
17: Re: request feedback on a new licence profile (Darren Duncan)
18: Re: request feedback on a new licence profile (Darren Duncan)
19: Interview about Open Source and IBM's 500 patents (Lawrence Rosen)
20: Creative Common as open source license? (Manuel Bastioni)
21: brainstorming (Benjamin Rossen)
22: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Ian Jackson)
23: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Ian Jackson)
24: Re: brainstorming (Thorsten Glaser)
25: Re: Creative Common as open source license? (Michal Nazarewicz)
26: Re: brainstorming (Benjamin Rossen)
27: Re: brainstorming (Kevin Bedell)
28: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Bob Scheifler)
29: Re: brainstorming (Thorsten Glaser)
30: Re: brainstorming (Thorsten Glaser)
31: Re: brainstorming (Thorsten Glaser)
32: Re: brainstorming (Benjamin Rossen)
33: Human Models -- Re: Creative Common as open source license? (Stephen Pollei)
34: Re: brainstorming (Benjamin Rossen)
35: Re: brainstorming (Benjamin Rossen)
36: Re: brainstorming (Benjamin Rossen)
37: Re: brainstorming (Thorsten Glaser)
38: Re: brainstorming (Benjamin Rossen)
39: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Lawrence Rosen)
40: Re: brainstorming (Bjorn Reese)
41: Re: Human Models -- Re: Creative Common as open source license? (Manuel Bastioni)
42: Re: brainstorming (Benjamin Rossen)
43: Re: brainstorming (Arnoud Engelfriet)
44: Re: brainstorming (Benjamin Rossen)
45: Re: brainstorming (Russell Nelson)
46: Re: Human Models -- Re: Creative Common as open source license? (Evan Prodromou)
47: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Chuck Swiger)
48: Re: Human Models -- Re: Creative Common as open source license? (Stephen Pollei)
49: Re: brainstorming (jurban.law.usc.edu)
50: Re: brainstorming (Benjamin Rossen)
51: Re: brainstorming (Benjamin Rossen)
52: Re: brainstorming (Thorsten Glaser)
53: Re: brainstorming (Brian Behlendorf)
54: Proper license for plugins (Kelly Anderson)
55: Re: Proper license for plugins (Benjamin Rossen)
56: Re: Proper license for plugins (Michael R. Bernstein)
57: Re: Proper license for plugins (Stephen Pollei)
58: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (todd glassey)
59: Re: Proper license for plugins (Stephen Pollei)
60: Cherokee Nation Open Source License (Brian Behlendorf)
61: Re: brainstorming (Benjamin Rossen)
62: Re: Cherokee Nation Open Source License (Benjamin Rossen)
63: Re: brainstorming (Rick Moen)
64: Re: brainstorming (Benjamin Rossen)
65: Re: brainstorming (bobyrne.iol.ie)
66: Re: brainstorming (Benjamin Rossen)
67: Re: brainstorming (bobyrne.iol.ie)
68: Re: brainstorming (Benjamin Rossen)
69: Re: brainstorming (Benjamin Rossen)
70: Re: brainstorming (bobyrne.iol.ie)
71: Re: Cherokee Nation Open Source License (Giacomo A. Catenazzi)
72: Re: Proper license for plugins (Kelly Anderson)
73: Re: Proper license for plugins (Michael R. Bernstein)
74: Re: Cherokee Nation Open Source License (Stephen Pollei)
75: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Lawrence Rosen)
76: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Chuck Swiger)
77: Re: brainstorming (Benjamin Rossen)
78: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Bob Scheifler)
79: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Chuck Swiger)
80: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Bob Scheifler)
81: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Russell Nelson)
82: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Bob Scheifler)
83: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Sam Hartman)
84: Re: license with patent grants appropriate for specifications? (Thorsten Glaser)
85: open source medical software (Donnal Walter)
86: Re: open source medical software (Lawrence Rosen)
87: Re: open source medical software (Mark Shewmaker)
88: Re: open source medical software (Richard Schilling)
89: Re: open source medical software (Benjamin Rossen)
90: Re: open source medical software (Randall Burns)
91: Re: open source medical software (Benjamin Rossen)
92: Re: open source medical software (Donnal Walter)
93: Re: open source medical software (Donnal Walter)
94: Re: open source medical software (Stephen C. North)
95: Re: open source medical software (Donnal Walter)
96: Re: open source medical software (Benjamin Rossen)
97: Re: open source medical software (Robin 'Roblimo' Miller)
98: A laymans request for advice (Tom Mahoney)
99: Vita Nuova Liberal Source Licence (Adam Hunt)