Subject: Re: Intel's proposed BSD + Patent License
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 01:15:40 -0500 (EST)

Russell Nelson scripsit:

> Sure, why not?  The GPL discriminates against people who want to
> create proprietary derivative copies.

Foo.  That is not discrimination; "people who want to do XXX" is not
a *pre-existing* group, which surely is what is meant.  You might
as well say that your local supermarket discriminates against people
who have no money.

The Intel license *does* discriminate against a pre-existing group:
those who don't use Linux (and drafting the license so as not
to mention Linux is an obvious tactic, the kind used in U.S. tax
law to grant BigCos a tax break without naming them).

> Understand that the patent grant is not what is creating the
> discrimination.  It is the existance of software patents.  They are
> evil and must be destroyed.  But until they are, we have to deal with
> them.

Fine.  Let Intel license its patent royalty-free and without discrimination.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3