Subject: RE: There is a separate list for license proliferation discussions
From: "Laura Majerus" <LMajerus@fenwick.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 12:42:57 -0700

 Thu, 1 Sep 2005 12:42:57 -0700
If y'all think this is the right place, I stand corrected. The reason we
made two lists was to try to keep traffic down for those people who
didn't want to read license proliferation messages, but if you all think
this discussion belongs here, go to it!

It would be nice if you cross-posted to the
license-proliferation-discuss list, but certainly not required.

Laura 

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Bligh [mailto:alex@alex.org.uk] 
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 1:36 AM
To: lrosen@rosenlaw.com; license-discuss@opensource.org
Cc: Alex Bligh
Subject: RE: There is a separate list for license proliferation
discussions

I'd tend to agree with Larry - license-discuss is the right place for
now for the reasons he said, but also because proliferation arguments
are contained in 90% of the messages re approving or not-approving new
licenses (which is meant to be on license-discuss). If it was the case
that proliferation was an orthogonal issue to approval, I would agree
with Laura
- but it isn't, at least in the mind of one prominent OSI board member.
Thus whilst approvals are impacted, here is the right place.

Alex

--On 31 August 2005 16:33 -0700 Lawrence Rosen <lrosen@rosenlaw.com>
wrote:

> I specifically directed folks to license-discuss because that's where 
> all the subscribers are. Lots of people lurk on this list who may not 
> have bothered subscribing to a special proliferation discussion.
>
> We need a public conversation where we've always talked about 
> licenses, so we can tell which licenses proliferate and which don't. 
> Sorry, Laura, I'm not looking forward to talking with a subset of 
> folks here, or just a committee meeting. At least not yet. :-)
>
> /Larry
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lmajerus@speakeasy.net [mailto:lmajerus@speakeasy.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 4:19 PM
>> To: license-discuss@opensource.org;
>> license-proliferation-discuss@opensource.org
>> Subject: There is a separate list for license proliferation 
>> discussions
>>
>> All,  Please send license proliferation related posts to 
>> license-proliferation-discuss (not license-discuss, which is for 
>> license approval discussion).  Thanks.
>>
>> NOTE:  You can subscribe to the license-proliferation-discuss email 
>> list by sending an email to 
>> license-proliferation-discuss-subscribe@opensource.org
>> ----------------------
>> [Larry Rosen wrote]
>> [snip]
>> I believe the place to have this dialogue is at OSI's discussion 
>> list, license-discuss@opensource.org. For those of you who merely 
>> lurk there without speaking up, I also welcome private email.
>>
>
>



Alex
--------------------------------------------------------

IRS Circular 230  Disclosure:  To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the
IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice in this communication (including
attachments) is not intended or written by Fenwick & West LLP to be used, and cannot
be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or
(ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter
addressed herein.
--------------------------------------------------------

ATTENTION:
The information contained in this message may be legally privileged and confidential.
 It is intended to be read only by the individual or entity to whom it is addressed
or by their designee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you
are on notice that any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly prohibited.
 
If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and/or
Fenwick & West LLP by telephone at (650) 988-8500 and delete or destroy any copy of
this message.