Subject: Re: conducting a sane and efficient GPLv3, LGPLv3 Review
From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 22:08:32 +0100

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> Could it be possible that FSF does *not* wish court scrutiny of the
> "pure"*** GPL under copyright and contract law?

Which forms of licence that meet the OSD do you consider to be legally 
valid?

If there are any, is there any remaining scope for new licences in those 
classes?

If the answer to either the first or second question is "none", why are 
you on a list that is specifically there for the purpose of accrediting 
new licences as complying with the OSD?

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.