Subject: RE: OVPL summary
From: "Wilson, Andrew" <andrew.wilson@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:43:05 -0700

 Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:43:05 -0700
Chuck Swiger wrote:

> I do *not* think the ID ought to release a proprietary version of the
software 
> containing significant changes made by someone else without a written 
> instrument from that someone.

I agree.  My concerns about OVPL could be addressed by making sec. 3.3
optional
and allowing a licensee to opt in by returning a signed copy to the ID.

Andy Wilson
Intel Open Source Technology Center