Subject: Re: (OT) - NOT A Major Blow to Copyleft Theory
From: Matthew Flaschen <>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 20:54:56 -0500

Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2008 4:56 PM, Matthew Flaschen <> wrote:
>> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>>> On Feb 9, 2008 3:56 PM, Matthew Flaschen <> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> What I'm "implying" is that your argument is specious.
>>> Hand waving.
>> I said very clearly why it's specious.  The government simply doesn't
>> enforce the law, the vast majority of the time.
> Here again you seem to falsely imply that the act was somehow illegal.
> I submit that the act was utterly legal.

Maybe it is, maybe it isn't.  The point is that your argument, "And I'm 
still not in prison. How come?" is totally non-persuasive.

Matt Flaschen