Subject: RE: restricting the use of open source software
From: "Anderson, Kelly" <KAnderson@dentrix.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:58:59 -0600

 Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:58:59 -0600
Software doesn't kill people, people do. And besides, if you ban
software only criminals will have software... :-)



-Kelly

-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Moffitt [mailto:nick@zork.net] 
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 8:57 AM
To: license-discuss@opensource.org
Subject: Re: restricting the use of open source software

Second, all that you gain by putting this sort of clause in a license
text is the right to open anotehr in a series of legal cases for
whatever lawbreaker you're worried about.  If you have a "must not use
to rob banks" clause, and it comes up in a trial that Machine-Gun Kelly
ran your code as part of a heist, all you get is the right to try and
open a civil suit against him for license violation.  You'd either be
stuck on a long waiting list of petty-crime "me toos", or you'd actually
delay the serving of Kelly's criminal sentence with your goofy copyright
claims.

So in closing: 
	1) Not everyone needs to be bound by your particular laws.  
	2) You don't even gain anything worthwhile by re-enforcing
	    these laws in your software license.






E-Mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By reading the
message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for taking
protective action against such code. Sender is not liable for any loss or damage arising
from this message.

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is
intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.