Subject: Re: Policy Questions (WAS: License Committee Report)
From: "Eric S. Raymond" <esr@thyrsus.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 16:24:44 -0400

Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>:
> Eric,
> 
> --On 09 September 2005 14:27 -0400 "Eric S. Raymond" <esr@thyrsus.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> >My own preference in this situation would be for the license-discuss
> >members who believe the criteria are broken
> 
> Could you post (here, and if possible arrange for them to be posted to the
> web site) the text of the three criteria as passed by the board? I /think/
> we only have the original ones Russ posted for review, which was presumably
> prior to approval by the board. Without them, it's a bit difficult to see
> whether or not they are broken. Equally the message "OSI evalutates
> licenses by unknown criteria" is hardly a good one for anyone involved.
> 
> Alex

Russ, to make very sure we get the correct and final form I would 
appreciate it if you extracted those from the Board minutes.
-- 
		<a href="Eric">http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>