Subject: RE: Status of ACE License Submission
From: "Smith, McCoy" <mccoy.smith@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 06:59:36 -0700

 Thu, 22 Sep 2005 06:59:36 -0700
Here is a description of it:
http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/38172.html
Your attorneys, hopefully, should know about this. 

-----Original Message-----
From: schmidt@dre.vanderbilt.edu [mailto:schmidt@dre.vanderbilt.edu] 
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 6:14 AM
To: atai@atai.org
Cc: Russell Nelson; license-discuss@opensource.org
Subject: Re: Status of ACE License Submission 


Hi,

> Please consider dual license it under the Apache License 2 and the GNU
> LGPL so ACE can be used in GPLed programs.  Just using the Apache
> license will make ACE not usable with GPL programs, severely limiting
> ACE/TAO.

Can you please let me know what it means to have a dual license?  Which
license takes priority?!

Thanks,

        Doug

> --- Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com> wrote:
> > Yes.  Your license is not reusable by any other
> > party.  May I suggest
> > that rather than creating Yet Another License which
> > nobody else is
> > going to use, you switch to using the Apache 2.0
> > License?  It seems to
> > cover all your bases better than the BSD license and
> > better than your
> > own license.  For example, the ACE license doesn't
> > give the recipient
> > a patent license.
> > 
> > I have marked up the ACE license with the applicable
> > Apache terms and
> > put it at http://russnelson.com/ACE-license.html
> > 
> > -- 
> > --my blog is at     blog.russnelson.com         |
> > with some experience 
> > Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok |   
> >  you know what to do.
> > 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241       |
> > with more experience
> > Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  |     Sheepdog          |   
> >  you know what not to do.
> >