Subject: Re: License in question
From: Martin Konold <>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:15:11 +0100

Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 21:56 schrieb Chuck Swiger:


> > following way. Do you know if this is Ok or would you suggest to use
> > another (GPLed but less documented packed) package instead?

> appears to be GPL-compatible, but I'd ask for a second opinion from
> <> if you wanted to be sure.

I assume that the license is incompatible to the GPL because

> 4. This notice may not be removed or altered./

This adds an extra obligation not present in the GPL.

-- martin

Erlewein, Frank, Konold & Partner - Beratende Ingenieure und Physiker