Subject: Re: "Biological Open Source"
From: Michael Bernstein <webmaven@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:35:50 -0800

On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 11:57 +1100, Janet Hope wrote:
> Note that I've put "or any improvement to Biotech Process" in square
> brackets.  That's to indicate that if I left that part out, it would
> be an academic or permissive style of licence, but if I included it,
> it would be a reciprocal or copyleft style of licence.  Is that
> correct?

Seems to me that an equivalent to a strong reciprocal license would say
"or any patented improvement to Biotech Process unless they are also
licensed under the JBPPNAC."

IANAL, TINLA.

- Michael R. Bernstein 
  michaelbernstein.com