Subject: Re: ZDNet article - why attribution matters
From: Rick Moen <rick@linuxmafia.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 10:51:37 -0800

Quoting John-Sugar (john@sugarcrm.com):

> Open source for us is a descriptor that says the source code is
> provided, is extensible, redistributable, no restrictions of use and
> is patent free, etc.                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Is it OK to sell SPL 1.3-covered code and derivatives?  Your SPL FAQ 
(http://www.sugarcrm.com/crm/open-source/public-license-faq.html, item
4) says no.  Which would make it a shareware licence, and contravene
OSD#6.