Subject: Re: conducting a sane and efficient GPLv3, LGPLv3 Review
From: "Alexander Terekhov" <alexander.terekhov@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 07:38:21 +0200

 Wed, 1 Aug 2007 07:38:21 +0200
On 8/1/07, Rick Moen <rick@linuxmafia.com> wrote:
> Quoting Alexander Terekhov (alexander.terekhov@gmail.com):
> > On 8/1/07, Rick Moen <rick@linuxmafia.com> wrote:
>
> > > Indeed, I think what you say is abundantly obvious, and doing
> > > anything else would merely waste everyone's time.
> >
> > Yeah, time aside, Google search yields this:
>
> [snip 150 further lines of some series of rambles about patents,
> collective works, and licence compatibility.]
>
> No, actually, we're  not  likely to set aside considerations of avoiding
> time wasteage -- but thank you for the graphical reminder of why.

Speak for yourself, wannabe mafioso.

>
> Is there even the faintest chance that you have a coherent point, and
> that it might cast even the  dimmest  light on OSD-compliance?  Or is
> this all just some outrévariant of performance art?

Reread it. And visit also

http://www.usfca.edu/law/determann/softwarecombinations060403.pdf

Hth.

regards,
alexander.