Subject: Re: conducting a sane and efficient GPLv3, LGPLv3 Review
From: Matthew Flaschen <>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:30:02 -0400

Alexander Terekhov wrote:

 > neither the original author, nor any
> creator of a revised or improved version, may charge for the software
> or allow any successor to charge.

I can't see how the GPL could remotely be interpreted as prohibiting the 
original author from charging for work they hold copyright on.

Matt Flaschen