Subject: Re: For Approval: Microsoft Permissive License
From: Nils Labugt <elabu@online.no>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 01:10:33 +0200

søn, 19.08.2007 kl. 15.43 -0700, skrev Chris Travers:
> Similarly, does the GPL work as a whole clause prevent me from using GPL 
> components, creating a work, releasing that work under a dual-license 
> model (standard GPL or at the option of the customer a standard EULA but 
> with the addition of warranty terms)?  If the user always has the choice 
> to use the GPL terms, I would argue that the license has not been violated.
> 
> In short, is there anything in the MS-PL that precludes use of the code 
> from complying with all of the other terms set in the GPL v3?  I don't 
> see any.
> >

I would read "only under this license" as "under this license and not
under any other license".

Nils Labugt