Nils Labugt wrote:
>
> I would read "only under this license" as "under this license and not
> under any other license".
>   
That is an odd reading of a license that doesn't require, say, the 
distribution of source code at all (as noted by the conditional).  That 
seems to suggest that binary-only distributions with standard EULA's are 
acceptable forms of distribution...

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers