Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:23:14 -0700
Nils Labugt wrote:
>
> I would read "only under this license" as "under this license and not
> under any other license".
>
That is an odd reading of a license that doesn't require, say, the
distribution of source code at all (as noted by the conditional). That
seems to suggest that binary-only distributions with standard EULA's are
acceptable forms of distribution...
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
["text/x-vcard" not shown]