Subject: Re: claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that...
From: Rick Moen <>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:45:36 -0700

Quoting Matthew Flaschen (

> This is ridiculous.  The list is not for general copyright law
> discussions, nor for general license discussions, nor for general
> contract discussions.  It exists so that licenses submitted to OSI can
> be discussed before approval.  There are obviously occasional
> discussions unrelated that topic, but they should be kept to a minimum.

Mr. Terekhov knows this, but finds the fact inconvenient.  See also: