Subject: Re: [OT] For Approval: MLL (minimal library license)
From: Matthew Flaschen <>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:03:42 -0500

Chris Travers wrote:
> I think the issue is that this license came out of a concern about GPL
> v3 compatibility which I raised.

That's possible, but he didn't mention any particular version of the
GPL.  In fact, he gave very little justification for the license, and
still hasn't.

Matt Flaschen