Subject: Re: Questions about the two-clause BSD license
From:Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:58:24 +0200

 Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:58:24 +0200
Pimm Hogeling <pimmhogeling@gmail.com> writes:
> We seem to agree that including the license itself with the binary
> form is pointless because it doesn't actually have any effect, though
> it is required by the license.

It is pointless in my iPod scenario, but there are others in which it is
possible, in fact almost trivial, to separate at least some of the
BSD-licensed code from the proprietary code: Mac OS X, for instance, or
a Juniper router.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no