Subject: Re: Announcing OWFa and CLA 1.0
From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 09:04:28 +0100

John Cowan wrote:

> 
> In that case, the company needs to transfer the copyright, which is not

Which is what "assign" means.

> the same thing as a CLA.  A CLA gives the upstream certain rights, but
> the copyright remains with the originator.

Agreed.

> 
> What I don't see is why an upstream license should be different from a
> downstream license.

In the case I know of, Asterisk, it is because the primary developer 
wants to be able to use contributions in their commercial products, so 
in return for acting as publisher and managing a bug reporting system, 
they only deal with contributions under their CLA.  The CLA is not open 
source.



-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.