Subject: Re: Pending OSI License Committee work?
From: Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 13:53:51 -0400

Luis Villa <luis@tieguy.org> writes:
>There used to be a list of pending work in a bug tracker somewhere,
>but I'm not sure it is kept up to date. I'm also not sure there is a
>formal committee.

Bug tracker?  I'm glad I asked :-).  Where is that?

>For what little it is worth, Mozilla has pre-informed the list of
>Mozilla's intention to submit MPL 2.0. There are also some requests
>from Python to formalize some of their license changes, and from us to
>move a variety of licenses to deprecated. These are discussed to some
>extent in the archives:
>
>MPL Alpha 3 with full description/justification as required by
>submission rules:
>http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?17:mss:1086:201010:ggfnogkgelclnaiklmcl
>MPL Beta 2 followup:
>http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?17:mss:1253:hmegfolplfgiidkhjdoa
>
>The Python requests went to license-discuss instead of license-review:
>see March archives: http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:ddp:0:201104#b
>
>Discussion of updates to the license list:
>http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:16970:bejhhahadgjpophdchji

You rock for digging these up, thanks.  I'll try to make sure our
tracking system is up-to-date with all this, and get a handle on what's
pending with deadlines vs what's just at the discussion stage.

-K