Subject: Re: binary restrictions?
From: Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 16:04:29 -0400 (EDT)

Ned Lilly writes:
 > Is anyone aware of a license which permits source access and
 > modifications, patch contributions, but restricts the right to
 > distribute compiled binaries to the sponsoring organization?

A binary is a derived work.  An open source license has to allow
distribution of binaries.  That's not to say that you can't create a
Source-Available license which prohibited binary distribution, but it
wouldn't be Open Source, and we wouldn't certify it.

-- 
-russ nelson <sig@russnelson.com>  http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | It's a crime, not an act
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | of war.  For my take, see:
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | http://quaker.org/crime.html
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3