Subject: Re: fileset without makefiles Open Source?!
From: Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 14:23:49 -0400 (EDT)

Harald Albrecht writes:
 > Lately I had a discussion with someone who wants to provide source code 
 > for his project, but without makefile(s). He intends to call it "Open 
 > Source".

Grrrrrrrr.  Nobody has a trademark on Open Source, so he can call it
that if he wants.  But he's gonna annoy a lot of people who download
it only to find out that it's not directly buildable.  So, okay,
somebody will write a Makefile, and create a derivative work which
includes the Makefile.

If he intends that to be the only obstacle to people making derivative 
works, he will fail.

-- 
-russ nelson <sig@russnelson.com>  http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | It's a crime, not an act
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | of war.  For my take, see:
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | http://quaker.org/crime.html
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3