Subject: Re: GPL under MacOS and NewtonOS
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 13:21:30 -0500 (EST)

Paul Guyot scripsit:

> It's about this paragraph of section 3:
> 
> >The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for 
> >making modifications to it. For an executable work, complete source 
> >code means all the source code for all modules it contains, plus any 
> >associated interface definition files, plus the scripets used to 
> >control compilation and installation of the executable. However, as 
> >a special exception, the source code distributed need not include 
> >anything that is normally distributed (in either source or binary 
> >form) with the major components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of the 
> >operating system on which the executable runs, unless that component 
> >itself accompanies the executable.

I think the deal here is that things normally distributed with
*the compiler* are no problem, even if the compiler isn't normally
distributed with the OS.  After all, Solaris is distributed without
a compiler, and nobody doubts that you can compile GNU utilities
with the (non-free) cc.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3