Subject: Re: Is the "Guile" license OSI approved?
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 22:16:43 -0500 (EST)

Karsten M. Self scripsit:

> > FSF may never seek OSI approval for its licenses (the source needs no
> > approval from the derivative), but implicitly any GNU software license
> > is Open Source... 
> 
> Wrong.

What license could possibly be a free software license (as defined by
FSF) without also being an open source license (as defined by OSI)?
It may not be OSI *certified*, but that's a different thing.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3