Subject: Re: Advertising Clauses in Licenses
From: Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:56:41 -0500 (EST)

Forrest J. Cavalier III writes:
 > Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com> wrote (in part)
 > 
 > > There is much in the OSD which is insufficiently explicit.  For
 > > example, we have maintained that there are no possible restrictions
 > > a license could put on users, because there is no possible mechanism
 > > one could use to constraint them, because no approved license can
 > > require that the user execute a license (OSD#7).
 > 
 > I think it is a problem that "execute a license" is not defined.
 > 
 > As far as I can tell, the GPL is indeed a license.  And making
 > a modified version, or distributing a copy, binds you to the
 > license.  Isn't that executing a license?

You could argue that.  We haven't done that, though.  Instead, we
consider that you are accepting the permissions granted to you by the
copyright holder.

-- 
-russ nelson              http://russnelson.com | Crypto without a threat
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | model is like cookies
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | without milk.
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | 
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3