Subject: Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution
From: Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 23:20:01 -0400 (EDT)

Rick Moen writes:
 > Quoting Russell Nelson (nelson@crynwr.com):
 > 
 > > Oh, it's *always* had to be changed.  Anybody could insert
 > > restrictions on use into a license and ask us to approve it.  Since
 > > the OSD says nothing about a license not being allowed to have
 > > restrictions on use, we would have to approve the license.
 > 
 > Or they'll turn you into a newt?  
 > 
 > Russ, on other occasions, I believe you've been among those reminding
 > people that the OSD isn't a black-box algorithm into which you plug 
 > candidate licences to determine whether they pass or fail.  Whether
 > I recall correctly or not, those were words of wisdom.

They were also wrong.  Oh, we *can* stretch the definition, but
inventing requirements out of whole cloth is an invitation to a party
-- party to a lawsuit, that is.

-- 
-russ nelson              http://russnelson.com |
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | businesses persuade
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | governments coerce
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   |
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3