Subject: Perl artistic license : embeding a perl interpreter
From: Olivier Garcia <ogarcia@waidan.com>
Date: 05 Nov 2002 11:28:34 +0100

 05 Nov 2002 11:28:34 +0100
Hi.

I would like to know if it's legal to put a perl interpreter (the
standard one) into a closed source commercial program (in C) in order to
allow users to add/modify program functionalities via perl scripting.

As I understand the artistic license
(http://www.perl.com/language/misc/Artistic.html), it's possible to do
so if : 

* the commercial program is distributed with standard version of
libraries (para n4)
* the program is linked with those libraries (para n5)


But I'm not sure with the para n8 : 

> Aggregation of this Package with a commercial distribution is always 
> permitted provided that the use of this Package is embedded; that is, 
> when no overt attempt is made to make this Package's interfaces 
> visible to the end user of the commercial distribution. Such use shall
> not be construed as a distribution of this Package.

I'm not sure to understand the "that is, ... Package." part.


Regards

---
Olivier


--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3