Subject: Re: Plan 9 license
From: "Bruce Dodson" <bruce_dodson@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 21:55:07 -0400

I disagree.  (I know, I do that a lot, but I mean well.)

It's best if licenses are simply either approved or not approved.  There is
no list of licenses that have been rejected or withdrawn; that would be
punitive.  By the same token, there should be no special status given to
licenses in limbo.

> Perhaps OSI would list licenses that have ended
> in limbo (neither rejected nor approved) and/or
> list licenses that claim to be "open source" but
> which are not (yet) certified by the OSI.
>
> --
> ralph
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3