Subject: RE: Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL
From: "Lawrence E. Rosen" <>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 18:28:17 -0800

> It's not you, the AFL copyright holder, who can choose not to 
> care.  It's Jimmy Q. Gplauthor, whose copyright is infringed 
> by having a derivative work (the GPL+AFL code) distributed 
> under more restrictive terms than the GPL.

Huh?  Is Jimmy == Person A, Person B or Person C?  Keep your parties
straight.  I challenge you to find any copyright infringement in
anything I suggested!!!!


license-discuss archive is at